2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10816-008-9051-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a Landscape History as Part of a Survey Strategy: A Critique of Current Settlement System Approaches based on Case Studies from Western New South Wales, Australia

Abstract: In Australia, geomorphological change since the late nineteenth century ensures surface artifact visibility but the contribution of full coverage regional survey to an understanding of past landscape use is limited by the lack of easily datable artifacts. Here, we describe a multi-stage survey strategy based around intensive archaeological, geomorphological and chronological studies as an alternative to traditional site-based approaches. We view the formation of the archaeological record as a sedimentary proce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1999, using previously tested protocols ( [11], [12]), we surveyed the terrace surface at ND by establishing a grid of 1 m x1 m squares across an area of approximately 700 square metres. The grid was oriented N-S, using an electronic total station set up over a permanent bench mark established in the northeast corner using GPS (relative to WGS 84).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 1999, using previously tested protocols ( [11], [12]), we surveyed the terrace surface at ND by establishing a grid of 1 m x1 m squares across an area of approximately 700 square metres. The grid was oriented N-S, using an electronic total station set up over a permanent bench mark established in the northeast corner using GPS (relative to WGS 84).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the past ten years, the Western New South Wales Archaeology Program (WNSWAP) has been developing not only new ways of recording and analysing this extensive surface (i.e., open site) record ( [5], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]), but also a chronology of occupation based on radiocarbon dating of charcoal from the hearths and Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) dating of the surfaces on which the archaeological record now rests ( [17], [18], [19]). As indicated in Figure 1, we have studied these surface artefact assemblages from a number of locations across a large area of western NSW.…”
Section: Location and Description Of The Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New lines of evidence are required to expand the debate and, thus, there is a need for innovative research that critically assesses monolithic models and implements broader regional research designs (Kealhofer and Grave 2008;Stark 2006). Settlement pattern studies allow archaeologists to articulate dynamic relationships among sites at local and regional levels, which is often not possible through excavations alone (e.g., Billman and Feinman 1999;Holdaway and Fanning 2008;Marcus and Flannery 1996;Sinopoli 2006;Underhill et al 2008).…”
Section: Applications Of Heterarchy: Methodological Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, the lithic density at Tor at-Tareeq upper is neither among the highest nor the lowest of the seven site occupations. One of the reasons that these contradictions exist is that these so-called lithic measures of level of mobility do not consider the movement of lithics across the landscape, that is, the fact that lithic artifacts are both transported into and exported out of sites (e.g., Roth and Dibble, 1998;Holdaway and Fanning, 2008;Turq et al, 2013). Nor do they incorporate the idea of timeaveraging (Bailey, 1983(Bailey, , 2007Wandsnider, 1992;Stern, 1994;Holdaway and Wandsnider, 2006;Lucas, 2012).…”
Section: Time-averaging and Interpretation Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%