Developing a kinematic understanding of chest compressions: the impact of depth and release time on blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Abstract

Background Effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a critical component of the pre-hospital treatment of cardiac arrest victims. Mechanical chest compression (MCC) devices enable the delivery of MCC waveforms that could not be delivered effectively by hand. While chest compression generated blood flow has been studied for more than 50 years, the relation between sternum kinematics (depth over time) and the resulting blood flow have not been well described. Using a five parameter MCC model, we studied the effect of MCC depth, MCC release time, and their interaction on MCC generated blood flow in a highly instrumented swine model of cardiac arrest.MethodsMCC hemodynamics were studied in 17 domestic swine (~30 kg) using multiple extra-vascular flow probes and standard physiological monitoring. After 10 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation, mechanical MCC were started. MCC varied such that sternal release occurred over 100, 200, or 300 ms. MCC were delivered at a rate of 100 per min and at a depth of 1.25″ (n = 9) or at a depth of 1.9″ (n = 8) for a total of 18 min. Transitions between release times occurred every 2 min and were randomized. Linear Mixed Models were used to estimate the effect of MCC depth, MCC release time, and the interaction between MCC depth and release time on physiological outcomes.ResultsBlood pressures were optimized by a 200 ms release. End tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) was optimized by a 100 ms release. Blood flows were significantly lower at a 300 ms release than at either a 100 or 200 ms release (p < 0.05). 1.9″ deep MCC improved EtCO2, right atrial pressure, coronary perfusion pressure, inferior vena cava blood flow, carotid blood flow, and renal vein blood flow relative to 1.25″ MCC.ConclusionsDeeper MCC improved several hemodynamic parameters. Chest compressions with a 300 ms release time generated less blood flow than chest compressions with faster release times. MCC release time is an important quantitative metric of MCC quality and, if optimized, could improve MCC generated blood flows and pressures.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12938-015-0095-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Does the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback devices improve the quality of chest compressions performed by doctors? A prospective, randomized, cross-over simulation study

“…Current guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation recommends that the depth of CCs in adults is between 50 and 60 mm [4]. As shown by studies conducted by Lampe et al [19], deeper CCs redirect several hemodynamic parameters. Iskrzycki et al [20] conducting studies on the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation carried out by water rescuers, demonstrated that the use of visual real-time feedback devices has improved the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in relatively unexperienced cardiopulmonary resuscitation providers.…”

Recent advances in personalizing cardiac arrest resuscitation

“…Using a swine model to monitor vascular flow during mechanical CC, Lampe et al . found that although longer release times of 300 ms were detrimental to ensuring blood flow, there was no difference in hemodynamic characteristics between release times of 200 and 100 ms 25 . Instead, 100 ms release times were associated with increased endotracheal CO 2 production.…”

Comparison of standard and over-the-head method of chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - a simulation study

“…Irrespective of whether the person conducting chest compressions is at the patient's side or behind their head, they must adjust the pressure on the sternum in order to achieve the correct depth of compression. This depth has been assessed in numerous scientific studies, both those conducted in clinical conditions as well as those conducted on laboratory animals [1,[21][22][23]. In their research, The quality of CPR is affected by the rate with which chest compressions are made.…”