Developing a framework of quality indicators for healthcare business cases: a qualitative document analysis consolidating insight from expert guidance and current practice

Abstract

Background Business cases are used to provide a structured justification in favour of investing in new projects, services or interventions. Despite the use of business cases in determining how limited resources will be allocated within England’s National Health Service (NHS), guidance concerning how to develop and evaluate business cases in the context of healthcare is inconstant and of varying relevance. This study aimed to develop a new framework of quality indicators for healthcare-related business cases by analysing the content of expert guidance documents and a sample of NHS business cases. Methods Qualitative document analysis was conducted on guidance documents ( n = 7) and existing NHS business case documents ( n = 18). Documents were purposefully sampled using criteria to ensure the framework reflected a diverse spread of expert opinion, and a varied sample of example business cases from current practice. Data were analysed using thematic and content analysis, and are presented in a visualised framework. Results Seven themes were identified within the qualitative document analysis (purpose, strategic priorities, options, benefits, costs, risks and evaluation). These themes were described and presented with a framework of quality indicators for healthcare-related business cases. Conclusion To ou`r knowledge, this is the first framework of business case quality indicators designed specifically for use in a healthcare context. The framework presented in this study has implications for how business cases are developed and evaluated by decision makers. In the future it would be beneficial to investigate how the framework could be used in practice as a tool for critical appraisal.

COVID-19 vaccines and treatments nationalism: Challenges for low-income countries and the attainment of the SDGs

“…To address the objectives highlighted earlier, the work utilised the qualitative approach in data gathering (Wood et al, 2020) as this came across as the most appropriate. The main methods included document and critical discourse analysis (Linton et al, 2019) and elements of event study (Bimha & Nhamo, 2017). The events that were tracked included key announcements from global institutions such as the John Hopkins University, which provides daily data on COVID-19 cases in terms of infections, deaths and recoveries, as well as vaccines and treatments development from key pharmaceutical companies, philanthropic organisations and the WHO.…”

Tourism Economic Stimulus Packages as a Response to COVID-19

“…The research method was a critical document review and analysis (Linton et al 2019;Bowen 2009). This method was appropriate, given the considerable amount of data about COVID-19 in general and the impacts of COVID-19 on the tourism and hospitality sector in particular.…”

Steps and theories towards more effective business case processes within existing organisations: an inter-disciplinary systematic literature review

“…, 2015; Schmidek and Weeks, 2005), did a content analysis of BC documents in practice (e.g. Linton et al. , 2019; Pronk et al.…”

“…For practitioners, the 20-step method demonstrates a wider view to the BC and provides a clear approach to composing their BCs for any change that they might need to consider. 62,78,148,172,257,263 Organisation/organization/corporation 7 41, 78,148,148,203,228,263 Justification/-ying or argument(s) or reasoning or rationale or evidence 20 14,41,48,54,55,62,71,78,80,83,95,115,148,172,187,221,228,249,257,263 Project 13 14,41,55,62,80,95,115,148,166,172,187,257,263 Intervention or change or cause 9 11, 35,48,78,83,158,187,191,216 Secure commitment, approval or support from management 8 14, 48,…”