2021
DOI: 10.1111/jan.14945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a conceptual model of older patients’ decision‐making process in choosing dialysis or conservative care using meta‐ethnography

Abstract: Aims:To systematically review and synthesize qualitative evidence related to decisionmaking for treatment modalities among older adults with end-stage renal disease. Design:A meta-synthesis of the qualitative research was conducted. Data sources: A comprehensive literature review using PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Sciences and Cochrane was systematically conducted. Qualitative studies published in English from January 2010 to October 2020 were considered. Review methods: Qualitative studies were sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Engagement in decision‐making is another central theme identified in the included studies. The findings of this review share similarities with previous reviews on decision‐making during the transition to dialysis 21,67–70 . While diverse models of decision‐making exist (e.g., the paternalistic model, the informed model and the shared model), this review, consistent with previous reviews, underscores the significance of recognizing patients' needs, beliefs and preferences and enabling their active participation in decision‐making through tailored education, effective communication and equitable relationships.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Engagement in decision‐making is another central theme identified in the included studies. The findings of this review share similarities with previous reviews on decision‐making during the transition to dialysis 21,67–70 . While diverse models of decision‐making exist (e.g., the paternalistic model, the informed model and the shared model), this review, consistent with previous reviews, underscores the significance of recognizing patients' needs, beliefs and preferences and enabling their active participation in decision‐making through tailored education, effective communication and equitable relationships.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The findings of this review share similarities with previous reviews on decision-making during the transition to dialysis. 21,[67][68][69][70] While diverse models of decision-making exist (e.g., the paternalistic model, the informed model and the shared model), this review, consistent with previous reviews, underscores the significance of recognizing patients' needs, beliefs and preferences and enabling…”
Section: Engagement In Self-caresupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Recent publications have shown benefit of dedicated approaches of shared decision making to support renal clinicians and patients, and provide a practical and holistic approach to inform treatment choices. 55 , 56 End-of-life conversations and planning must be embedded as an early, ongoing, and standard practice with continuity and adaptability according to patient circumstances, analogous to any other medical intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we add that this hope is tinged with uncertainty. We also add a nuance related to waiting in the hope implicit in making decisions about kidney replacement therapy [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having to visit the hospital three times a week for hemodialysis; having to change peritoneal fluid daily; being subject to significant dietary, social and leisure restrictions and the loss of independence significantly reduce people’s quality of life [ 15 , 16 ]. Therefore, when choosing a therapy, one of the main considerations of people in the final stages of CKD is maintaining the highest possible quality of life [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%