Developers and farmers intertwining interventions: the case of rainwater harvesting and food-for-work in Degua Temben, Tigray, Ethiopia

Abstract

Understanding the objectives, strategies and actions of the different actors that play a role in the implementation of rural development programmes is a key to explaining the latter's success and sustainability. Based on in-depth anthropological fieldwork and from an actor perspective this paper shows how the Rainwater Harvesting Pond Programme (RHPP) and the public work component of the Productive Safety Net Programme (PSNP) work out in practice in one district of the Tigray region in Ethiopia. Developers and farmers turn the two essentially unrelated rural development programmes into practically intertwined interventions, which leads to an undesirable set of outcomes. The RHPP's participants, who are conceived of as willing to improve, are favoured above other candidates for employment in the PSNP, which farmers compete for. Developers' and farmers' moves and countermoves result in targeting errors in the PSNP and in farmers massively constructing rainwater harvesting ponds, the large majority of which fail because farmers do not aspire to make them succeed, but merely see them as a stepping stone to employment in the PSNP. In addition both groups' perception of each other is affected. Our observations challenge prevailing interpretations of the effects of development interventions on Tigrayan people's livelihoods.

Re-Greening Ethiopia: History, Challenges and Lessons

“…Sites are supposed to be selected jointly, by involving communities, but development agents (DAs) of the District Office of Agriculture together with kebelle (the lowest administrative unit in Ethiopia) administrators reportedly dominate the process. Consulting with farmers implies convincing them to implement the development programs planned by the government in federal or regional capitals [20,21]. This is partly because government sets targets (e.g., areas under area exclosure) that the district and kebelle administrators have to meet.…”

Glocal Ethiopia Échelles et repositionnements des pouvoirs

“…Si certains auteurs observent une réelle adaptation des communautés locales aux nouvelles injonctions (Lefort, 2012), voire un détournement allant jusqu'à capture du pouvoir (Emmenegger et al, 2011 ;Segers, 2008 ;Pausewang, 2002b), d'autres observent au contraire le maintien si ce n'est le renforcement de pratiques autoritaires qui prolongent des pratiques de pouvoir ou des représentations culturelles organisées autour de rapports de domination (Abbink, 2011), notamment concernant les relations entre l'État et la paysannerie (Dessalegn Rahmato, 2009 ;Lefort, 2010 ;Aspen, 2002, Pausewang, 2002a. L'encadrement public des espaces locaux est tel qu'il produit davantage de contrôle qu'il ne favorise le développement en raison de la forte politisation des enjeux de ce dernier (Planel, 2014).…”

Agricultural intensification in Ethiopia: Review of recent research

“…One study found disincentives for creating successful systems done by those involved in the Food for Work program and that failure helps secure employment in the program (Segers et al, 2008). Another study found the Programme is effective at protecting household food security and maintain asset levels but was not an effective mechanism to overcome poverty or result in the governmental objective of food self-sufficiency (Maxwell et al, 2013;Siyoum, 2013).…”