Developed watershed classification index determining management priority level based on watershed carrying capacity

Sriyana, Sriyana

doi:10.1051/matecconf/201927004004

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 7 publications

(10 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Implementing watershed management programs in Indonesia involves significant financial, human resource, multi-sectoral stakeholder, and central or regional government commitment [62]. Therefore, it requires prioritization that aims to recognize the most appropriate watershed for more operative strategies [63,64].…”

Section: Prioritization Of Watershedmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Review on Sustainability of Watershed Management in Indonesia

Narendra¹,

Siregar²,

Dharmawan³

et al. 2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper provides an overview of the implementation and obstacles of watershed management, and the alternative solutions based on a synoptic review of related studies and experiences across Indonesia. The review found that problems in the institutional aspect were hierarchical confusion, discrepancy, and asynchrony among regulations, and weak (participation, synchronization, and coordination) among watershed management stakeholders. The weaknesses in the planning stage are integration among sectors, a lack of community participation, and limited readiness to integrate watershed planning into regional planning. Stakeholders’ involvement is also a critical factor in successful implementation of degraded watershed rehabilitation, including in peatland and mangrove areas. Failure should be minimized by providing adequate information on degraded watershed characteristics, appropriate species choices, and effective mechanical construction for soil and water conservation. Community participation as the main factor in driving watershed management should be achieved by strengthening public awareness of the importance of a sustainable watershed and providing access for the community to be involved in each stage of watershed management. Another problem is data gaps which are essential to address from the planning to evaluation stages. The gaps can be bridged by using remotely sensed data and by applying hydrological-based simulation models. Simplified criteria for watershed assessment may also be required, depending on site-specific issues and the watershed scale.

show abstract

Section: Prioritization Of Watershedmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…60/2014. Priority categorization uses the carrying capacity of watersheds by weighting and scoring the parameters and indicators, i.e., land condition, water system, socioeconomic and institution, waterworks investment, and spatial utilization [62].…”

Section: Prioritization Of Watershedmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review on Sustainability of Watershed Management in Indonesia

Narendra¹,

Siregar²,

Dharmawan³

et al. 2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The management performance of a watershed is determined by several indicators and criteria as characteristics of a watershed. One that plays a very important role in determining watershed performance is the condition of the land (Sriyana, 2019;Sudia et al, 2023). Land conditions are a dynamic characteristic, always changing along with the influence of human activities within a watershed (Setyowati et al, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Land conditions are a dynamic characteristic, always changing along with the influence of human activities within a watershed (Setyowati et al, 2021). Determination of watershed management performance by monitoring the carrying capacity of land in several watersheds in Indonesia has been widely carried out in order to determine the classification of watershed management performance carrying capacity with the status of each parameter varying from bad to good management status (Sriyana, 2019;Supangat and Wahyuningrum, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance of Wanggu Watershed Management Based on Land Indicators

2023

indones. j. env. man. sus.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on the study, it was found that the land in the Wanggu Watershed is highly dynamic due to community activities such as agriculture, plantations, forestry, and settlement development. This can affect the performance and carrying capacity of the land in the watershed. The purpose of study was to evaluate the performance of watershed management and analyze the land-carrying capacity based on indicators of land. The parameters analyzed were the percentage of critical land area, the percentage of vegetation cover, and the erosion index. To obtain the data needed for the study, both primary and secondary data were used. Primary data was obtained through the overlay of the base map to obtain a map of critical land, making land cover maps, and calculating erosion prediction and carrying capacity analysis of the Wanggu Watershed. Secondary data was obtained from related agencies in the form of critical land data, land cover data, literature, policy documents, and study reports that are relevant to watershed management performance. The results of the study showed that the percentage of critical and somewhat critical land area in the Wanggu Watershed is 16.07 percent, which means that this value still qualifies as high category critical land recovery. The percentage of vegetation cover, especially forest cover, is 27.10 percent, which is still in bad condition. The average erosion index value is 2.00, which is high. Based on these three parameters of land condition indicators in the Wanggu Watershed, the performance of watershed management has a poor land carrying capacity category with a value of 50. Overall, the study highlights the need for better management and conservation of the land in the Wanggu Watershed to improve its performance and carrying capacity.

show abstract

Evaluation on biophysical carrying capacity to support land rehabilitation planning in the upstream watershed

Supangat¹,

Wahyuningrum²

2021

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A comprehensive Soil and Water Conservation (SWC) plan is needed, supported by information on the condition of the Biophysical Carrying Capacity (BCC) of the watershed so that land rehabilitation activities will be right on target. The research aims to evaluate the BCC to support the SWC planning for the upstream watershed. The research area was in the Naruan Micro Watershed (NMW), the upstream of Keduang Sub Watershed, the Bengawan Solo Watershed. The analysis of the BCC used evaluation criteria based on the Ministry of Forestry Regulation (PerMenhut) No. P.61/Menhut-II/2014 concerning monitoring and evaluation of watershed management. The evaluation showed that the BCC in the research area was in the “Bad” category with a value of 128.0. It means that the watershed needs to be restored, particularly in terms of biophysical features. Several parameters indicated a poor category, i.g. the land aspect such as Percentage of Degraded Land (PDL) and Erosion Index (EI) parameters, while in the water system aspect such as the Flow Regime Coefficient (FRC), Annual Flow Coefficient (AFC), and Sediment Load (SL) parameters. These five parameters must become a concern and an important starting point for land rehabilitation planning in the form of SWC measures.

show abstract

Developed watershed classification index determining management priority level based on watershed carrying capacity

Cited by 3 publications

References 7 publications

A Review on Sustainability of Watershed Management in Indonesia

A Review on Sustainability of Watershed Management in Indonesia

Performance of Wanggu Watershed Management Based on Land Indicators

Evaluation on biophysical carrying capacity to support land rehabilitation planning in the upstream watershed

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About