Deutsche transkulturelle Übersetzung des Injustice Experience Questionnaire

Niederstrasser, Nils Georg; Steiger, Beat; Welsch, Katja; Hartmann, Sven; Nilges, P.; Ljutow, A.; Ettlin, Dominik A

doi:10.1007/s00482-018-0329-z

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 15 publications

(24 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Of the 191 patients initially fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 164 gave written content to participate in this cross-sectional study. The IEQ (Injustice Experience Questionnaire, German version) was distributed to the patients, during their stay for the assessment [25].…”

Section: Patientsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Opioid Consumption in Chronic Pain Patients: Role of Perceived Injustice and Other Psychological and Socioeconomic Factors

Kleinmann

Wolter

2022

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Chronic pain is a complex biopsychosocial phenomenon. Lifestyle, behavioral, socioeconomic, and psychosocial factors such as depression and perceived injustice are often associated with the development of chronic pain and vice versa. We sought to examine the interaction of these factors with opioid intake. Methods: At our institution, 164 patients with chronic pain undergoing an interdisciplinary assessment within a three-month period participated in the study and completed the Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ). Data regarding opioid intake, pain levels, pain diagnosis, depression, anxiety, stress, quality of life, pain-related disability, habitual well-being, occupational status, and ongoing workers compensation litigation were extracted from the patients’ charts. Results: Approximately one-fourth of the patients used opioids. The IEQ total was significantly higher in patients using Schedule III opioids. Depression, but not the anxiety and stress scores, were significantly higher in patients using opioids. There were no significant differences regarding pain-related disability, habitual well-being, and the coded psychosocial diagnoses. In the patient group without opioids, the percentage of employed persons was significantly higher but there were no significant differences regarding work leave, pension application, or professional education. Conclusions: Opioid use appears to be more closely related to psychological factors and single social determinants of pain than to somatic factors.

show abstract

Section: Patientsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Opioid Consumption in Chronic Pain Patients: Role of Perceived Injustice and Other Psychological and Socioeconomic Factors

Kleinmann

Wolter

2022

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Der maximale Summenwert beträgt 48 für den ganzen Fragenbogen und je 24 für die beiden Subskalen "unwiederbringlicher Verlust (IEQ-Items 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 und 8)" und "Schuldzuweisung / Ungerechtigkeit (IEQ-Items 3, 7, 9, 10, 11 und 12 )" [26]. Für diese Studie wurde die finale Version der deutschen Übersetzung des IEQ verwendet [19]. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS): Die PCS erfasst katastrophisierende Gedanken und entsprechendes Verhalten.…”

Section: Verwendete Instrumenteunclassified

“…In dieser Studie wurde an einer Stichprobe von 134 Patienten, die an Schmerzen mit unterschiedlicher Lokalisierung, Dauer und Ursache litten, eine nach den Kriterien transkultureller Übersetzung finalisierte deutsche Version des IEQ validiert [19].…”

Section: Diskussionunclassified

“…Der IEQ ist momentan nicht als validiertes Instrument in deutscher Sprache verfügbar und die Abwesenheit von Alternativen zur Bewertung wahrgenommener Ungerechtigkeit unterstreicht die Notwendigkeit einer validierten deutschen Übersetzung. Eine transkulturelle Anpassung und Übersetzung des IEQ von englischer in deutsche Sprache existiert bereits, wurde allerdings noch nicht validiert [19].…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validierung der deutschen Übersetzung des Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ) in 5 ambulanten Schmerzbehandlungseinrichtungen

Steiger

Welsch

Niederstrasser

et al. 2018

Schmerz

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Pain–to–Well-Being Relationship in Patients Experiencing Chronic Orofacial Pain

Bhalang

Steiger²,

Lukic

et al. 2020

Front. Neurol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Orofacial pain features may negatively influence a person's well-being and vice versa. Some aspects of well-being can be measured with axis II instruments that assess patients' psychosocial and behavioral status. The aim of this study was to investigate associations between pain features and psychosocial variables as indicators of well-being.Materials and Methods: Seven hundred ninety-nine anonymized datasets collected using the Web-based Interdisciplinary Symptom Evaluation (WISE) of patients reporting to the Interdisciplinary Orofacial Pain Unit, University of Zurich, between March 19, 2017 and May 19, 2019, were analyzed. Pain features including intensity, number of locations, impact, and duration were evaluated. Psychometric measures assessed pain-related catastrophizing and disability, illness perception, distress, anxiety, depression, injustice experience, dysmorphic concerns, and insomnia.Results: Most patients were between 30 and 59 years old (58.3%), female (69.8%), working (66.0%), and experienced pain for more than 6 months (68.5%). Pain intensities were higher in women than men and higher in disabled than working patients. Scores indicating elevated stress and depression were also observed in disabled patients. The sample prevalence rates of clinically relevant axis II instrument scores were as follows: Graded Chronic Pain Scale for the Head (GCPS-H), 27%; Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ4), 21%; PHQ9, 21%; Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), 20%; General Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD7), 15%; Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), 15%; Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ), 14%; GCPS for the Body (GCPS-B), 13%; PHQ for Stress (PHQstr), 6%; and Dysmorphic Concern Questionnaire (DCQ), 2%. Noteworthy results of correlation analysis of the clinically relevant axis II scores and pain measures were as follows: the PHQstr had moderate associations (0.34–0.43) with the sum of pain intensity at rest and during function, number of pain locations, and typical pain intensity. The IEQ scores were moderately associated with typical pain intensity at 0.39. The DCQ scores were moderately associated with pain extension at 0.41.Conclusions: Moderate correlations of certain pain and well-being measures were found in patients reporting clinically relevant stress, injustice experience, and dysmorphic concern, all of which reflect impaired well-being. PHQ4 is suitable for routine distress screening in the clinical setting.

show abstract

Deutsche transkulturelle Übersetzung des Injustice Experience Questionnaire

Cited by 3 publications

References 15 publications

Opioid Consumption in Chronic Pain Patients: Role of Perceived Injustice and Other Psychological and Socioeconomic Factors

Opioid Consumption in Chronic Pain Patients: Role of Perceived Injustice and Other Psychological and Socioeconomic Factors

Validierung der deutschen Übersetzung des Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ) in 5 ambulanten Schmerzbehandlungseinrichtungen

The Pain–to–Well-Being Relationship in Patients Experiencing Chronic Orofacial Pain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About