1955
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.97.456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DeuteriumHe3Reaction

Abstract: The proposed scheme of Fig. 8 with the newly postulated ^605-kev transition encounters difficulties when one considers the deexcitation of the 1365-kev level by only the 563-kev gamma ray. The situation would be partially alleviated if the 1367-kev gamma ray led from the 1365 level to the ground state. The measured conversion coefficient is then too small to be consistent with the spin assignments. In addition, the coincidence measurements indicate that more low-energy beta decays are followed by 605-kev gamma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I Kunz (1955) The solution to this problem, however, comes from the R-matrix fit, as can be seen in Fig. 8.…”
Section: Data For the Reaction 3he(dp)4hementioning
confidence: 99%
“…I Kunz (1955) The solution to this problem, however, comes from the R-matrix fit, as can be seen in Fig. 8.…”
Section: Data For the Reaction 3he(dp)4hementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy dependence of the cross section a(\ v o -v\) may be approximated either by direct interpolation of the experimental data (Kunz 1955;Conner et al 1952;Bonner et al 1952) or by using one of any fitting functions (for example Miley et al 1974) with sufficient accuracy. The energy dependence of the cross section a(\ v o -v\) may be approximated either by direct interpolation of the experimental data (Kunz 1955;Conner et al 1952;Bonner et al 1952) or by using one of any fitting functions (for example Miley et al 1974) with sufficient accuracy.…”
Section: Theory Of Secondary Reaction Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…groups (Bonner, Conner, and Lillie, 18 and Arnold et al 4 ) also measured the 3 He(d,p) 4 He reaction. In a subsequent experiment in the low-energy region, Kunz 19 disagrees with the above data. He had an energy shift from 5-15 keV higher, so his crosssection values are 30-50% lower than the previous work.…”
Section: B 3 He(dp) 4 He and 6 Li(p 3 He) 4 Hementioning
confidence: 54%