1972
DOI: 10.1139/v72-057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deuterium Isotope Effects in the Reduction of Cyclohexanones. The Concepts of Steric Approach Control and Product Development Control

Abstract: Definitions for the terms steric approach control and product deuelopment control in relation to the degree of bonding in the transition state are put forward. Kinetic deuterium isotope effects in the reduction of a graded series of ketones by NaBH, and NaBD, have been measured. These effects are inverse, and show no systematic dependence on the degree of steric hindrance of the ketone. This evidence appears to invalidate the steric approach control-product development control explanation of the axial to equat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work we determined kinetic isotope effects for the borohydride reductions of the least reactive cation in each of the series 1 (X = O, S and NMe) and found k BH 4 /k BD 4 (25°C) = 1.25, 1.63 and 0.94, respectively. These values are similar to those found for other borohydride reductions 34 and are also believed to be consistent with early transition states.…”
Section: Reaction Kineticssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In this work we determined kinetic isotope effects for the borohydride reductions of the least reactive cation in each of the series 1 (X = O, S and NMe) and found k BH 4 /k BD 4 (25°C) = 1.25, 1.63 and 0.94, respectively. These values are similar to those found for other borohydride reductions 34 and are also believed to be consistent with early transition states.…”
Section: Reaction Kineticssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Steric approach control, however, does not assume a Curtin–Hammett kinetic scenario. Instead, it focuses on what steric interactions develop upon bringing a reagent close to the starting material. , Such steric interactions in the transition state can be sufficient to define selectivity. It is correct that steric approach is involved in the other modes of stereocontrol as well (as in determining which face is attacked once chelation had occurred or what interactions occur in the Felkin–Anh transition state once orbital interactions are optimized), but steric approach control requires only steric factors developing between the components of a reaction to explain selectivity.…”
Section: Caveats Regarding Stereochemical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the reduction of 13-oxobaccatin III 1,14-carbonate, which gave a mixture of 13Îą- (major stereomer) and 13β-hydroxybaccatin III derivatives, only the single 13Îą-hydroxy epimers (i.e., 5 from 4 and 9/10 from 8 ) were isolated. A favored approach of the hydride ion from the less hindered β-face of the C-13 keto group of the folded structure of the taxane skeleton, or the double bond of the lactone ring, well accounts for such selectivity. , In the present case, the presence of the furanone ring increased the steric demand, thus allowing a high steric control in the reduction process. Furthermore, the Îą-OH isomers are probably the more thermodinamically stable compounds, as evinced when an equilibration occurred between 6 and 5 (see below, Scheme ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%