2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.12.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detuning and wave breaking during nonlinear surface wave focusing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9(d) (Multimedia view). 11,13 The position of the wave crest at the inception of breaking in this experiment was estimated as x exp br = 8.43 m.…”
Section: Fig 8 As Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9(d) (Multimedia view). 11,13 The position of the wave crest at the inception of breaking in this experiment was estimated as x exp br = 8.43 m.…”
Section: Fig 8 As Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional energetic wave-breaking criterion was introduced in Refs. [11][12][13]. It is well established that geometric criteria that do not take into account the spectral shape are oversimplified to predict accurately the inception of breaking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a general observation, the relative error of the theoretical Kelvin and Poincaré wave frequencies derived from the linear dispersion relation [14,49] decreases from the lateral boundary to the interior. The substantial mismatch between the theoretical linear frequencies and the experimental results might be related with nonlinear resonant interactions [51] and viscous detuning [5,26,29,31]. Therefore, one might expect that the basin-scale wavefield in regions closer to the lateral boundary is more susceptible to viscous and nonlinear detuning, since it is subject to stronger nonlinearities (steepening, nonhydrostatic and rotating-induced dispersion) than the interior wavefield.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is possible that the shifts in peak frequencies in Fig. 4, with respect to theoretical frequencies, correspond to nonlinear and viscous detuning [5,26,29,31]. The analytical solution (2a) most likely also tells us something about the relative height/ strength of the excited modes, but we will not discuss it here.…”
Section: Near-lateral Boundary Gravity Wavefieldmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Il est important de souligner que le déferlement sur la pente empêche la focalisation parfaite, ce qui n'est pas l'objectif ultime de ce travail (WHITTAKER et al, 2017). La présence de la pente et le phénomène de focalisation prématurée (LIU et al, 2016) [12.13 ; 12.81] [12.07 ; 12.69] Thème 1 -Hydrodynamique côtière…”
Section: Matérielunclassified