2014
DOI: 10.2113/gsrocky.49.2.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detrital zircon provenance of Pennsylvanian to Permian sandstones from the Wyoming craton and Wood River Basin, Idaho, U.S.A.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The detritalzircon age distribution in the Pennsyl vanian-Permian sandstones (Fig. 10A; Link et al, 2014), Neoproterozoic Winder mere Supergroup (Fig. 10G; Ross and Parrish, 1991;Gehrels and Ross, 1998), and the Mesoproterozoic Belt Supergroup (Fig.…”
Section: Group Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detritalzircon age distribution in the Pennsyl vanian-Permian sandstones (Fig. 10A; Link et al, 2014), Neoproterozoic Winder mere Supergroup (Fig. 10G; Ross and Parrish, 1991;Gehrels and Ross, 1998), and the Mesoproterozoic Belt Supergroup (Fig.…”
Section: Group Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These first-cycle basement sources were exposed throughout the Pennsylvanian and earliest Permian (Anderson and Morrison, 1992;Anderson et al, 1993;Holm et al, 2007;Giles et al, 2013;Lawton et al 2015a). These ages have also been documented in detrital zircons from a multitude of basin studies of Paleozoic strata along the Ouachita-Marathon suture zone as well as north and northeast of the Permian Basin, giving the possibility of sediment recycling (Dickinson and Gehrels, 2003;Becker et al, 2005;Becker et al, 2006;Gehrels et al, 2011b;Giles et al, 2013;Link et al, 2014;Xie et al, 2016).…”
Section: Late Paleoproterozoic (Ca 1825-1578 Ma)mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…As discussed previously, all potential sediment sources except for the Belt Supergroup, Neoproterozoic to Cambrian Brigham Group and coeval strata, Precambrian basement, and Mogollon Highlands, have Yavapai‐Mazatzal grains ranging in abundance from ~5% to 19%: 18% from the North American passive margin (Gehrels & Pecha, ; Malone et al, ; May et al, , ), 8% from Mesozoic eolianites (Dickinson & Gehrels, , ), 19% and 18% from the Paleozoic sandstones to the west and northern Colorado, respectively (Evans & Soreghan, ; Link et al, ; Nair et al, ; Siddoway & Gehrels, ), 5% from the Cordillera magmatic arc and batholiths (Laskowski et al, ), and 18% from Sevier foreland basin strata (May et al, , ). None of these sources can provide more than 20% Yavapai‐Mazatzal‐age zircons to the sample data set.…”
Section: Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The late Paleozoic eolian sandstones that blanketed much of the interior of western North America (Evans & Soreghan, ; e.g., the Tensleep Sandstone in Wyoming and Weber Sandstone in southeast Wyoming, northern Colorado, and Utah; Link et al, ; Nair et al, ) and the Paleozoic sandstones associated with the Ancestral Rocky Mountain basins, are another potential source of recycled zircon grains (Nair et al, ; Siddoway & Gehrels, ). The late Paleozoic eolian sandstones ( n = 734) are characterized by four major age groups of ~2000–1600, ~1500–1300, ~1300–900, and ~500–300 Ma and one less abundant age group of ~2800–2500 Ma (Figure ).…”
Section: Geological Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%