Abstract:Aim
This topical review presents common patients’ misbeliefs about temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and discusses their possible impact on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. We also discussed the possible influence of the beliefs and behaviours of healthcare providers on the beliefs of patients with TMD and suggested possible strategies to overcome the negative impacts of such misbeliefs.
Methods
This topical review was based on a non‐systematic search for studies about the beliefs of patients and health… Show more
“…Evaluation of the existing literature 8,13,15,17 including a recent meta‐synthesis of qualitative evidence 9 identified several themes relating to the experiences of patients with TMD. The three general themes listed below were used to support the recommendations suggested by patient participants in the Delphi process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further suggestions were given by participants in the second online meeting, and participants were given the opportunity to correct or modify any previously added recommendations. Evaluation of the existing literature 8,13,15,17 including a recent meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence 9 identified several themes relating to the experiences of patients with TMD. The three general themes listed below were used to support the recommendations suggested by patient participants in the Delphi process.…”
Background
Many patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) find it difficult to undergo dental care due to challenges caused by their condition, previous temporomandibular joint surgery or invasive dental procedures, and the impact of comorbid conditions. Managing routine dental care for some patients with TMD can be seen as challenging by some dental practitioners.
Objective
The objective of this study was to work with patients experiencing TMD and clinicians to co‐produce recommendations aimed at helping general dentists to provide routine dental care for patients with TMD.
Methods
A modified Delphi process was used to co‐produce recommendations. Six patients experiencing TMD, patient advocates and seven clinicians took part, including international TMD clinicians. Two meetings were held with patient participants, mediated by a trained facilitator. Recommendations suggested by patient participants were distributed to clinicians who were asked to add additional suggestions, but not to modify patients' recommendations unless to aid clarity. Additional themes were identified from the existing literature, and the recommendations were then reviewed by the International Network for Orofacial Pain and Related Disorders Methodology (INfORM) consortium.
Results
Recommendations were given to support patients before, during and after dental treatment. Participants identified specific and practical recommendations to help patients with TMD receive routine dental care, but also emphasised the need for professionals to listen sensitively to patients' concerns and work with patients in an empathetic and non‐judgmental way.
Conclusion
These recommendations, co‐developed with patients experiencing TMD, should help dental professionals to provide supportive general dental care for patients with TMD.
“…Evaluation of the existing literature 8,13,15,17 including a recent meta‐synthesis of qualitative evidence 9 identified several themes relating to the experiences of patients with TMD. The three general themes listed below were used to support the recommendations suggested by patient participants in the Delphi process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further suggestions were given by participants in the second online meeting, and participants were given the opportunity to correct or modify any previously added recommendations. Evaluation of the existing literature 8,13,15,17 including a recent meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence 9 identified several themes relating to the experiences of patients with TMD. The three general themes listed below were used to support the recommendations suggested by patient participants in the Delphi process.…”
Background
Many patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) find it difficult to undergo dental care due to challenges caused by their condition, previous temporomandibular joint surgery or invasive dental procedures, and the impact of comorbid conditions. Managing routine dental care for some patients with TMD can be seen as challenging by some dental practitioners.
Objective
The objective of this study was to work with patients experiencing TMD and clinicians to co‐produce recommendations aimed at helping general dentists to provide routine dental care for patients with TMD.
Methods
A modified Delphi process was used to co‐produce recommendations. Six patients experiencing TMD, patient advocates and seven clinicians took part, including international TMD clinicians. Two meetings were held with patient participants, mediated by a trained facilitator. Recommendations suggested by patient participants were distributed to clinicians who were asked to add additional suggestions, but not to modify patients' recommendations unless to aid clarity. Additional themes were identified from the existing literature, and the recommendations were then reviewed by the International Network for Orofacial Pain and Related Disorders Methodology (INfORM) consortium.
Results
Recommendations were given to support patients before, during and after dental treatment. Participants identified specific and practical recommendations to help patients with TMD receive routine dental care, but also emphasised the need for professionals to listen sensitively to patients' concerns and work with patients in an empathetic and non‐judgmental way.
Conclusion
These recommendations, co‐developed with patients experiencing TMD, should help dental professionals to provide supportive general dental care for patients with TMD.
“…This highlights the importance of addressing beliefs about pain control in improving treatment outcomes for TMD. 43 The correlations identified in the parsimonious multiple regression analysis were all statistically significant, underscoring the clinical relevance of the independent variables in elucidating the painful experience measured by the BPI-B in women with chronic painrelated TMD (p < .05). 9 However, the hypothesis regarding a potential association between the painful experience and the diagnoses established through the DC/TMD 18,19,44 was not supported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Previous research shows those with an external locus of control utilize more health services and have more significant disability and psychological issues and ineffective coping strategies such as reduced activities, hypervigilance and catastrophic behaviours. 42,43 Interestingly, no correlation was found with the locus of control attributed to health professionals, possibly indicating scepticism towards TMD diagnosis and treatment effectiveness. This highlights the importance of addressing beliefs about pain control in improving treatment outcomes for TMD.…”
BackgroundChronic pain is persistent or recurrent pain lasting longer than 3 months. The experience of temporomandibular disorder (TMD)‐related pain is modulated by emotional and social factors, with mindfulness encapsulating these aspects.ObjectiveTo investigate the association between cognitive‐behavioural‐emotional characteristics, mindfulness and the painful experience in women with chronic pain‐related TMD.MethodsA cross‐sectional study was conducted, including 90 women aged between 18 and 61 years old, diagnosed with chronic pain‐related TMD according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorder, considering both temporomandibular joint and muscle pain. Specific instruments were employed to assess cognitive‐behavioural‐emotional aspects. The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale and the Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire scales evaluated the level and construct of mindfulness. The relationship between variables was analysed using bivariate association tests (.05 > p < .20), followed by multiple regression tests (p < .05).ResultsThe heightened experience of pain correlated with increasing age, a low level of education, the attribution of the locus of control by chance, and lower levels of mindfulness (p < .05). The heightened experience of pain was negatively influenced by mindfulness levels (p < .05). On the other hand, the painful experience was mainly influenced by facets describing negative formulation, distraction, non‐reactivity and non‐judgement (p < .05).ConclusionDemographic, cognitive‐behavioural‐emotional data and levels of mindfulness and its facets presented different influence weights on the painful experience. These findings provide support for future studies focusing on mindfulness strategies, education and pain management in women with chronic pain‐related TMD.
“…Traditional nursing in clinical practice is passive and usually performed after complications or adverse reactions [ 22 ]. The core theme of personalized nursing is people-oriented, reflecting humanistic care, actively developing professional and targeted nursing for patients, and offsetting the passive nursing model [ 23 ]. We required the nursing staff to formulate a scientific and reasonable nursing plan before implementing nursing interventions to have a clear understanding of the nursing content according to the patient's condition, needs, and disease risk assessment [ 24 ].…”
Objective. This study aimed to explore the effects of individualized nursing in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Methods. From June 2019 to April 2021, 80 patients with TMD were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Among them, 40 patients (control group, CG) received routine nursing and 40 patients (experimental group, EG) received individualized nursing. Functional exercise compliance, pain score, maximum mouth opening, nursing satisfaction questionnaire, self-rating anxiety scale, and self-rating depression scale were investigated. Results. From June 2019 to April 2021, 81 patients with TMD were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Among them, 40 patients (control group) received routine care and 41 patients (experimental group) received individual care. There were no significant differences in mouth opening and pain score between the two groups before surgery
P
>
0.05
, but there were significant differences in mouth opening and pain score between the two groups 3 weeks after surgery. Patients’ anxiety and depression were assessed by the SAS and SDS scores. Before nursing, the control group and experimental group
P
<
0.05
had no significant difference. After nursing, the score of both groups decreased
P
<
0.05
. However, the score was lower in the experimental group, compared to the control group
P
<
0.01
. Conclusion. In summary, individualized nursing can improve patients’ physical condition and reduce negative emotions and complications. In light of this, the study needs further verification by a large sample randomized controlled trial.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.