1996
DOI: 10.1002/ana.410390422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detrimental effect of nitric oxide inhibition in experimental bacterial meningitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 To study the pathophysiologic processes after bacterial invasion of the central nervous system (CNS), direct intracerebroventricular or intracisternal injections of the pathogen is used and results in the development of meningitis in nearly 100% of inoculated animals. The successful establishment of experimental models of meningitis due to GBS, 17,23,24 L monocytogenes, [25][26][27] S pneumoniae, 28,29 H influenzae, 30 and E coli; 31 as well as, to a limited extent, N meningitis [32][33][34] has been reported. Based on the current knowledge on the pathophysiology of BM, the authors arbitrarily divided the processes leading to BM into three steps of the disease progression to more easily group them into mechanistic entities: colonization and invasion of the CNS; bacterial multiplication and CNS inflammation; and development of brain damage (Fig.…”
Section: Pathophysiology Of Bmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 To study the pathophysiologic processes after bacterial invasion of the central nervous system (CNS), direct intracerebroventricular or intracisternal injections of the pathogen is used and results in the development of meningitis in nearly 100% of inoculated animals. The successful establishment of experimental models of meningitis due to GBS, 17,23,24 L monocytogenes, [25][26][27] S pneumoniae, 28,29 H influenzae, 30 and E coli; 31 as well as, to a limited extent, N meningitis [32][33][34] has been reported. Based on the current knowledge on the pathophysiology of BM, the authors arbitrarily divided the processes leading to BM into three steps of the disease progression to more easily group them into mechanistic entities: colonization and invasion of the CNS; bacterial multiplication and CNS inflammation; and development of brain damage (Fig.…”
Section: Pathophysiology Of Bmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These fatal interactions apparently involve aspects of bacterial species and the specificity and selectivity of the arginine substrate inhibitor. For example, where experiments were performed during which NO production was competitively inhibited with the administration of nonmetabolizable arginine substrate analogs, experimental infection with a pathogen resulted in the inability for the defending immune cells to mount the needed NO response to kill the pathogens (Chan et al, 1995;Leib et al, 1996). Thus, stringent checks and balances need to be in place to coordinate and stabilize these biochemical events and it appears that AM performs such a coordinating function.…”
Section: Defining Inflammationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, increased mortality has also been reported after administration of NOS inhibitors to rats with experimental meningitis [8,10]. In an infant rat model of group B streptococcal meningitis, administration of the inducible NOS inhibitor aminoguanidine resulted in increased neuronal injury [11], higher bacterial titers and worsening of cerebral ischemia [12]. Therefore, the available data on the role of NO and the efficacy of NOS inhibitors as an adjunctive therapy in bacterial meningitis are still controversial, and further studies will be necessary to clarify this.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%