2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.06.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detrended fluctuation analysis of EEG patterns associated with real and imaginary arm movements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While averaged trials are usually exhibit a clearly pronounced difference between various types of movements (e.g., with left/right hand motor imagery), in the case of single trials, the classification problem is more drastic due to a high variability of EEG or MEG brain signals during imagination, as well as the existence of strong noise. Typically, the classification accuracy does not exceed 80% when special mathematical methods are applied, such as, e.g., SVM machines [55], wavelets [36,56], multilayer perceptrons [4], and recurrence quantitative measures [38].…”
Section: Results Of Real-time Classification Of Brain Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While averaged trials are usually exhibit a clearly pronounced difference between various types of movements (e.g., with left/right hand motor imagery), in the case of single trials, the classification problem is more drastic due to a high variability of EEG or MEG brain signals during imagination, as well as the existence of strong noise. Typically, the classification accuracy does not exceed 80% when special mathematical methods are applied, such as, e.g., SVM machines [55], wavelets [36,56], multilayer perceptrons [4], and recurrence quantitative measures [38].…”
Section: Results Of Real-time Classification Of Brain Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous studies have revealed the ability to recognize movement types, including mental intentions, based on the scaling exponent of long-range correlations that can be used, e.g., for brain–computer interfaces [ 38 ]. With these findings, here we performed a windowed DFA within a 2 s floating window (500 samples).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of DFA in EEG-based studies allows not only to distinguish between different physiological states (normal and pathological brain dynamics, baseline activity and sudden changes due to external influences, etc. ), but also to characterize the provoked short-term reactions during motor/cognitive tasks when the datasets under study include transients [ 37 , 38 ]. This is the case for brain–computer interfaces which require rapid recognition of specific EEG patterns in order to transform them into control commands for hardware.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, ERD detection is done via time-frequency analysis [Wang et al, 2004;Ince et al, 2007;Maksimenko et al, 2018b] with the decrease of spectral power density as a classification criteria [Carrera-Leon et al, 2012;Xu and Song, 2008]. Besides, various methods were applied for this purpose including spatial filtering [Wang et al, 2006], detrended fluctuation analysis [Pavlov et al, 2018;Pavlov et al, 2019], clasterization methods [Chholak et al, 2019], and artificial intelligence [Sakhavi et al, 2015;Grubov et al, 2017;Maksimenko et al, 2018a].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%