2022
DOI: 10.1177/03331024211067791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detoxification vs non-detoxification before starting an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody in medication overuse headache

Abstract: Background Medication overuse headache significantly contributes to the chronification process and treatment refractoriness of migraine. Currently, abrupt discontinuation of the overused medication still represents the best management strategy for these patients, challenging public health system resources. Methods In this prospective study, chronic migraine and medication overuse headache sufferers with at least 28 days of analgesic consumption per month were included. Assessment of efficacy outcomes at three … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 In a prospective cohort study of 111 patients with chronic migraine and MOH who used acute treatment at least 28 days per month, starting erenumab or galcanezumab was associated with significant improvement (decrease in monthly headache days, monthly pain medication intake, mean pain intensity, 6-item Head Impact Test [HIT-6], and Migraine Disability Assessment Score) after 3 months of treatment. 47 There was no significant difference in terms of improvement between the groups that underwent withdrawal of acute treatment in hospital and the group that did not. 47 In post-hoc analyses of the randomized trials for erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab, CGRP monoclonal antibodies were more effective than placebo in terms of frequency and disability regardless of the presence of medication overuse.…”
Section: Migraine May Predispose To Developing Mohmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…16 In a prospective cohort study of 111 patients with chronic migraine and MOH who used acute treatment at least 28 days per month, starting erenumab or galcanezumab was associated with significant improvement (decrease in monthly headache days, monthly pain medication intake, mean pain intensity, 6-item Head Impact Test [HIT-6], and Migraine Disability Assessment Score) after 3 months of treatment. 47 There was no significant difference in terms of improvement between the groups that underwent withdrawal of acute treatment in hospital and the group that did not. 47 In post-hoc analyses of the randomized trials for erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab, CGRP monoclonal antibodies were more effective than placebo in terms of frequency and disability regardless of the presence of medication overuse.…”
Section: Migraine May Predispose To Developing Mohmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…47 There was no significant difference in terms of improvement between the groups that underwent withdrawal of acute treatment in hospital and the group that did not. 47 In post-hoc analyses of the randomized trials for erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab, CGRP monoclonal antibodies were more effective than placebo in terms of frequency and disability regardless of the presence of medication overuse. [48][49][50][51] For example, erenumab had similar efficacy in terms of reduction in monthly migraine days and HIT-6 scores between the group with medication overuse and the group without.…”
Section: Migraine May Predispose To Developing Mohmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The efficacy of anti-CGRP mAbs for chronic migraine and medication-overuse headaches has been demonstrated in various subgroup analyses (15-17). Initially, specific subpopulations of patients with chronic migraine and MOH (15-17) were studied in the pivotal studies with the mAbs, but recently real-world studies aimed at these subsets of patients were also carried out and corroborated the potential usefulness of the mAbs, even in subjects who did not stop using the overused medications (14, 18,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, one might argue whether the use of anti-CGRP mAbs would add value to the improvement figures, with the supposed absence of differences in outcomes between the groups. Additionally, our study included only subjects with chronic migraine and MOH, different from other samples in which MOH was diagnosed in just some of the chronic migraineurs (14,18,19). This study is the first Brazilian study on MOH and the comparative use of mAbs and traditional pharmacological approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%