2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2nj02515a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detonation performance enhancement through a positional isomerism modification strategy

Abstract: The design, synthesis, physical properties, and calculated detonation performances of two skeleton isomeric energetic compounds containing tetrazole were introduced. By changing the chemical modification sites of the original fused-pyrimidine skeleton,...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to better understand the property difference of compounds 1 , 2 , and III , their electrostatic potentials (ESPs) were calculated and analyzed by using Multiwfn v3.5 software . The electrostatic potentials (ESPs) of III , 1 , and 2 were calculated to understand their intermolecular interactions, which closely affect the densities and impact sensitivities. ,, A larger electrostatic potential difference is more beneficial to form strong intermolecular hydrogen bonds as the driving force of hydrogen bonds is electrostatic attraction. , The electrostatic potential (ESP) surfaces of compounds III , 1 , and 2 are shown in Figure d–f. The electrostatic potential difference of 2 (87.57 kcal·mol –1 ) is smaller than those of 1 (90.01 kcal·mol –1 ) and III (91.15 kcal·mol –1 ), which means that 2 has weaker intermolecular hydrogen bonds than 1 and III .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to better understand the property difference of compounds 1 , 2 , and III , their electrostatic potentials (ESPs) were calculated and analyzed by using Multiwfn v3.5 software . The electrostatic potentials (ESPs) of III , 1 , and 2 were calculated to understand their intermolecular interactions, which closely affect the densities and impact sensitivities. ,, A larger electrostatic potential difference is more beneficial to form strong intermolecular hydrogen bonds as the driving force of hydrogen bonds is electrostatic attraction. , The electrostatic potential (ESP) surfaces of compounds III , 1 , and 2 are shown in Figure d–f. The electrostatic potential difference of 2 (87.57 kcal·mol –1 ) is smaller than those of 1 (90.01 kcal·mol –1 ) and III (91.15 kcal·mol –1 ), which means that 2 has weaker intermolecular hydrogen bonds than 1 and III .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 The electrostatic potentials (ESPs) of III, 1, and 2 were calculated to understand their intermolecular interactions, which closely affect the densities and impact sensitivities. 22,59,60 A larger electrostatic potential difference is more beneficial to form strong intermolecular hydrogen bonds as the driving force of hydrogen bonds is electrostatic attraction. 60,61 The electrostatic potential (ESP) surfaces of compounds III, 1, and 2 are shown in Figure 5d−f.…”
Section: Crystallographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation