2017
DOI: 10.1101/165670
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dethroning the Fano Factor: a flexible, model-based approach to partitioning neural variability

Abstract: Neurons in many brain areas exhibit high trial-to-trial variability, with spike counts that are over-dispersed relative to a Poisson distribution. Recent work (Goris et al., 2014) has proposed to explain this variability in terms of a multiplicative interaction between a stochastic gain variable and a stimulus-dependent Poisson firing rate, which produces quadratic relationships between spike count mean and variance. Here we examine this quadratic assumption and propose a more flexible family of models that ca… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing normalization models describe only the firing rate, and thus cannot assess the effect of normalization on variability. On the other hand, successful descriptive models of neuronal variability (Paninski, 2004;Pillow et al, 2008;Goris et al, 2014;Charles et al, 2018) typically ignore normalization. We therefore develop a model that explicitly parametrizes this relation and allows us to estimate the relevant parameters from data.…”
Section: Significance Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing normalization models describe only the firing rate, and thus cannot assess the effect of normalization on variability. On the other hand, successful descriptive models of neuronal variability (Paninski, 2004;Pillow et al, 2008;Goris et al, 2014;Charles et al, 2018) typically ignore normalization. We therefore develop a model that explicitly parametrizes this relation and allows us to estimate the relevant parameters from data.…”
Section: Significance Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R. R. Goris, Ballé, & Simoncelli, 2015;Rabinowitz, Goris, Cohen, & Simoncelli, 2015;Charles et al, 2018). Specifically, our model can be considered a continuous-time extension of previous work on flexible over-dispersion models for binned data (Charles et al, 2018). The extension to continuous time incurs extra complexity in that enough samples of a Gaussian Process need to be estimated to approximate an integral.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our model is influenced by recent work in characterizing over-dispersion in neural firing (R. Goris et al, 2014;N. R. R. Goris, Ballé, & Simoncelli, 2015;Rabinowitz, Goris, Cohen, & Simoncelli, 2015;Charles et al, 2018). Specifically, our model can be considered a continuous-time extension of previous work on flexible over-dispersion models for binned data (Charles et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations