2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.116.093602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deterministic Squeezed States with Collective Measurements and Feedback

Abstract: We demonstrate the creation of entangled, spin-squeezed states using a collective, or joint, measurement and real-time feedback. The pseudospin state of an ensemble of N = 5 × 10 4 laser-cooled 87 Rb atoms is deterministically driven to a specified population state with angular resolution that is a factor of 5.5(8) [7.4(6) dB] in variance below the standard quantum limit for unentangled atomscomparable to the best enhancements using only unitary evolution. Without feedback, conditioning on the outcome of the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
200
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
200
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They are, however, not capable of generating spin squeezing needed to lower the projection noise. In contrast, dispersive measurements based upon off-resonant atom-light interactions enabled experimental demonstration of 18-20-dB spin squeezing [25,26]. These experiments used high-finesse optical cavities to achieve strong atom-light interaction with low atom numbers, and require significant technical effort to stabilize to sufficient robustness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are, however, not capable of generating spin squeezing needed to lower the projection noise. In contrast, dispersive measurements based upon off-resonant atom-light interactions enabled experimental demonstration of 18-20-dB spin squeezing [25,26]. These experiments used high-finesse optical cavities to achieve strong atom-light interaction with low atom numbers, and require significant technical effort to stabilize to sufficient robustness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the mean spin and the variance are normalized to the value obtained for the |CSS . This corresponds to the procedure typically employed in the experiments [24,29,30]. As evident from the plot, the dashed black line which is obtained for symmetric probing of the atomic ensemble significantly differs from the present case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 44%
“…Measuring that the noise is squeezed below a certain bound is then a sufficient criterion for proving entanglement [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Due to the simplicity of this approach, it has been employed to show even multi-partite entanglement in a wide range of experiments [20][21][22][23][24]. However, an inherent assumption in the entanglement criteria based on spin squeezing is that all particles are probed with equal strength.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, building on the capability of quantum feedback reported in chapter 3, feedback is used to distil quantum correlations without destroying them. Feedback control of a mechanical oscillator thus joins the exclusive collective of a handful of platforms where manipulation of non-classical resources using feedback has been demonstrated [266,[328][329][330]. Finally, the fundamental limit of linear feedback control is elucidated: feedback, though capable of suppressing in-loop measurement back-action, is limited by quantum fluctuations amplified by the in-loop detector.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%