2019
DOI: 10.1002/polb.24787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining thermo‐mechanical properties of polydimethylsiloxanes from their strain‐induced spectral fingerprints

Abstract: Adaptive properties and complex shapes of modern day soft matter components create a challenge for materials applications where mechanical properties of intricate fabricated components cannot be determined from conventional invasive and destructive mechanical tests. In particular, challenges arising from variable mechanical properties of polydimethylsiloxanes (PDMSs) constantly attract wide‐scale attention in the fields of material sciences, biological systems, and microfluidics. Herein, a noninvasive and nond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there is no crack formation on the PSI-4 film after 1000 stretch–release cycles with varied strain ranges of 50–150%. To compare the thermal and mechanical properties of PSI to the conventional elastomers including SEBS and Sylgard 184, Table S4 summarizes the CTE and hysteresis of PSI-4 and those reported for SEBS and Sylgard 184. The CTEs (ppm K –1 ), hystereses (%), and U T (MJ m –3 ) of PSI-4, SEBS, and Sylgard 184 are (305, ∼35, 13), (150, ∼60, 9), and (∼280, ∼5, ∼1), respectively. As can be seen, PSI-4 presents a comparable CTE and a higher U T than Sylgard 184, and PSI-4 also possesses a lower hysteresis and a higher U T than SEBS, which indicates its excellent thermal and mechanical properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is no crack formation on the PSI-4 film after 1000 stretch–release cycles with varied strain ranges of 50–150%. To compare the thermal and mechanical properties of PSI to the conventional elastomers including SEBS and Sylgard 184, Table S4 summarizes the CTE and hysteresis of PSI-4 and those reported for SEBS and Sylgard 184. The CTEs (ppm K –1 ), hystereses (%), and U T (MJ m –3 ) of PSI-4, SEBS, and Sylgard 184 are (305, ∼35, 13), (150, ∼60, 9), and (∼280, ∼5, ∼1), respectively. As can be seen, PSI-4 presents a comparable CTE and a higher U T than Sylgard 184, and PSI-4 also possesses a lower hysteresis and a higher U T than SEBS, which indicates its excellent thermal and mechanical properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%