1999
DOI: 10.1159/000330862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the Utility and Effectiveness of the NeoPath AutoPap 300 QC System Used Routinely

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study determined that the FNR is 1.19%, which is higher than in the previous studies. On the other hand, studies in the USA observed the FNR to be 1.43% [5], 1.18% [6], 1.29% [12] and 1.13% [13]; the FNR in our study is similar to these.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our study determined that the FNR is 1.19%, which is higher than in the previous studies. On the other hand, studies in the USA observed the FNR to be 1.43% [5], 1.18% [6], 1.29% [12] and 1.13% [13]; the FNR in our study is similar to these.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Several US studies, which also utilized FocalPoint and were performed under similar conditions to ours, determined that the HSIL+/FN rates were 8.00% (4/50, QC = 13.8%) [5], 7.75% (11/142, QC = 20%) [6], 15.90% (7/44, QC = 10%) [12] and 3.68% (13/353, QC = 10%) [13]; the HSIL+/FN rate (34.2%) in our study is, however, significantly higher than these.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternative techniques, aimed at eliminating subjective diagnoses by cytological screeners, have been pursued. One approach to minimize the error rate in cervical cytology has been to use automated image analysis systems coupled with artificial neural networks (ANNs) to reduce the labor and time necessary to rescreen for false-negatives [16,17]. Another approach has been to improve the quality of slide preparation through the implementation of liquid-based or "thin-prep" methods [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both devices were initially approved for quality control rescreening, arguably a “hard nut to crack” in the commercial clinical arena. However, in laboratories where QC automation was implemented, small, but quantifiable and significant improvements were noted, namely in the reduced numbers of false-negative Pap tests [10,11]. Of course, the manufacturers had no intention of stopping with QC applications and they continued with FDA applications for primary screening - more robust economic business plans!…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%