2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.96.235444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the strength of magnetic and potential scattering of magnetic impurities on the surface of a topological insulator via quantum corrals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Ref. 45, which compared the LDOS with scanning tunnelling spectroscopy results, one can find that the strength of impurity potentials, m and u can vary between 0.3−3 and 3−30, respectively. This shows the practical importance of u for different magnetic impurities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Following Ref. 45, which compared the LDOS with scanning tunnelling spectroscopy results, one can find that the strength of impurity potentials, m and u can vary between 0.3−3 and 3−30, respectively. This shows the practical importance of u for different magnetic impurities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We find these values by comparing our spin-resolved LDOS with the results of Refs. [30][31][32][33] . To simplify our plots we express the coupling terms, J, and spin-resolved LDOS in units of (J c /h 2 v 2 F Ω BZ ) 2 and 1/h 2 v 2…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This violates the fundamental theory of TIs which asserts the robustness of the gapless Dirac cone in the non-magnetic state. In theory, impurity resonant states were proposed to be responsible for such modification of the local electronic structure and the non-magnetic gap at the DP [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. At present, however, the debate about exact nature of the non-magnetic gap continues due to the lack of photoemission experiments addressing the appearance of an energy gap in photoemission experiments without ferromagnetic order, which is inconsistency is still awaiting to be experimentally resolved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%