2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the relationship between restorative potential and size of a gene bank to alleviate the risks inherent in a scrapie eradication breeding programme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Primarily these risks are associated with novel TSE agents that are as yet unknown but may emerge in the future, as discussed above, and the possible loss of favourable attributes of a breed either through linkage or pleiotropic effects when selecting on a specific PrP alleles. To guard against this risk, semen gene banks have been proposed and designed [31], and now implemented in Great Britain and Northern Ireland, to provide the potential for future reintroduction of removed alleles or genotypes. Further, these semen banks have been designed accounting for the specific population dynamics and demographics of each sector of the UK sheep industry.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primarily these risks are associated with novel TSE agents that are as yet unknown but may emerge in the future, as discussed above, and the possible loss of favourable attributes of a breed either through linkage or pleiotropic effects when selecting on a specific PrP alleles. To guard against this risk, semen gene banks have been proposed and designed [31], and now implemented in Great Britain and Northern Ireland, to provide the potential for future reintroduction of removed alleles or genotypes. Further, these semen banks have been designed accounting for the specific population dynamics and demographics of each sector of the UK sheep industry.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined use of genealogical and molecular information in this scenario of conservation can be recommended. The implementation of a germplasm bank in order to manage the risks of novel ovine PrP polymorphisms and losses of genetic potential is also recommendable (Roughsedge et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this strategy might not be advisable since, in addition to the concurrent reduction in genetic progress for performance traits and the high genotyping costs involved, fixation of the ARR allele is risky given the uncertainty surrounding scrapie [4,5]. A safeguard is to maintain the alternative alleles in an appropriately designed gene bank [14,23]. In general, strategies leading to faster increases in the frequency of the ARR allele also led to slower rates of gain in performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%