2015
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1510.04890
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the QCD coupling from lattice vacuum polarization

Abstract: The QCD coupling appears in the perturbative expansion of the current-current two-point (vacuum polarization) function. Any lattice calculation of vacuum polarization is plagued by several competing non-perturbative effects at small momenta and by discretization errors at large momenta. We work in an intermediate region, computing the vacuum polarization for many off-axis momentum directions on the lattice. Having many momentum directions provides a way to monitor and account for lattice artifacts. Our results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A further investigation of this method was initiated in Hudspith 15 [781] and completed by Hudspith 18 [780] (see also [782]) based on domain-wall fermion configurations at three lattice spacings, a −1 = 1.78, 2.38, 3.15 GeV, with three different light-quark masses on the two coarser lattices and one on the fine lattice. An extensive discussion of condensates, using continuum finite-energy sum rules was employed to estimate where their contributions might be negligible.…”
Section: Discussion Of Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A further investigation of this method was initiated in Hudspith 15 [781] and completed by Hudspith 18 [780] (see also [782]) based on domain-wall fermion configurations at three lattice spacings, a −1 = 1.78, 2.38, 3.15 GeV, with three different light-quark masses on the two coarser lattices and one on the fine lattice. An extensive discussion of condensates, using continuum finite-energy sum rules was employed to estimate where their contributions might be negligible.…”
Section: Discussion Of Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 364) but with constant coefficients) no single condensate dominates and apparent convergence was poor for low Q 2 due to cancellations between contributions of similar size with alternating signs. (See, e.g., the list given by Hudspith 15 [781].) Choosing Q 2 to be at least ∼ 3.8 GeV 2 mitigated the problem, but then the coarsest lattice had to be discarded, due to large lattice artefacts.…”
Section: Discussion Of Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data for ∆Π τ (Q 2 ) over a wide range of Euclidean Q 2 can be generated using the lattice, with an appropriate cylinder cut applied to avoid lattice artifacts at high Q 2 . This issue has been studied in detail for the ensemble employed here in a recent analysis focused on determining α s from lattice current-current two-point function data [11]. Here we first consider data at Q 2 high enough that [∆Π τ ] OPE will be safely dominated by its leading D = 2 and 4 contributions.…”
Section: Lattice and Continuum Investigations Of The Ope Representati...mentioning
confidence: 99%