2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the primary sources of fecal pollution using microbial source tracking assays combined with land-use information in the Edwards Aquifer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique uses polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology to target and amplify DNA sequences indicative of host-specific bacterial groups, typically in the genus Bacteroides , that are found in the intestines of particular species of endothermic vertebrates and shed in feces (Reischer et al, 2013). Understanding the source of fecal contamination contributes substantially to making informed decisions on best management practices (BMPs) to reduce levels of contamination (Hinojosa et al, 2020; Shrestha et al, 2020; Steele et al, 2018). This technology has been implemented in modeling techniques for environmental risk assessment such as Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA) and Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to assess the concentration at which MST markers indicate a risk to public health (Boehm et al, 2018; Frey et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique uses polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology to target and amplify DNA sequences indicative of host-specific bacterial groups, typically in the genus Bacteroides , that are found in the intestines of particular species of endothermic vertebrates and shed in feces (Reischer et al, 2013). Understanding the source of fecal contamination contributes substantially to making informed decisions on best management practices (BMPs) to reduce levels of contamination (Hinojosa et al, 2020; Shrestha et al, 2020; Steele et al, 2018). This technology has been implemented in modeling techniques for environmental risk assessment such as Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA) and Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to assess the concentration at which MST markers indicate a risk to public health (Boehm et al, 2018; Frey et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The karstic Edwards Aquifer of Central Texas (USA) supplies water for more than 2 million people [1] and is recognized for high stygobiont biodiversity [2]. The 10,500 km 2 Edwards Aquifer occurs in a broad arc of Cretaceous limestones that stretch approximately 400 km across Central Texas, USA, and is hydrologically connected to the 91,744 km 2 Edwards-Trinity Aquifer (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effluent of wastewater treatment plants is an important route by which ARGs may enter the aquatic environment (Rizzo et al, 2013;Marti et al, 2014b;Rodriguez-Mozaz et al, 2015;Lekunberri et al, 2017;Zhou et al, 2020;Nguyen et al, 2021). Sewerage misconnections and leaking septic tanks may be a source of untreated sewage entering rivers and other waterbodies (Kay et al, 2008;Hinojosa et al, 2020;Reynolds et al, 2021). Furthermore, agricultural land run-off may also negatively impact water quality and introduce ARGs into waterbodies (Unc and Goss, 2004;Ballesté et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%