2004
DOI: 10.3171/jns.2004.100.3.0541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the position and size of the subthalamic nucleus based on magnetic resonance imaging results in patients with advanced Parkinson disease

Abstract: The size and position of the STN are highly variable, appearing to be smaller and situated more posterior and lateral on MR images than in atlases. Care must be taken in relying on coordinates relative to the commissures for targeting of the STN.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
112
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
112
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The center of the STN has been suggested to be represented by the anterior border of the red nucleus (Bejjani et al, 2000), or 2mm anterior to a line drawn orthogonal to the anterior border of the red nucleus (Danish et al, 2006). The size of the STN may be smaller than reported in the Talairach and Tournoux atlas, particularly in the medial-lateral direction (Richter et al, 2004).…”
Section: Stn-liesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The center of the STN has been suggested to be represented by the anterior border of the red nucleus (Bejjani et al, 2000), or 2mm anterior to a line drawn orthogonal to the anterior border of the red nucleus (Danish et al, 2006). The size of the STN may be smaller than reported in the Talairach and Tournoux atlas, particularly in the medial-lateral direction (Richter et al, 2004).…”
Section: Stn-liesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of localizations on postoperative structural MR imaging data in their specific anatomic context requires spatial normalization to transform individual anatomic variability [4][5][6] by geometric alignment of corresponding structures across patients (patient-to-patient) or to a standard (patient-to-atlas). Commonly, the position of the electrode is indirectly reported in coordinates along the 3 axes relative to the midcommissural point (MCP) between the anterior commissure (AC) and posterior commissure (PC) 1,[6][7][8][9][10][11] and is normalized by the individual distance from the AC to the PC in relation to a standard atlas ACPC distance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this normalization method disregards the individual mediolateral and dorsoventral dimensions, despite the substantial variability of the GPi 12,13 and the STN 8,9,14,15 with respect to the MCP. 16,17 For instance, the AC can vary in diameter from 3 to 8 mm, 18 and the inter-rater ambiguity in manual selection leads to considerable variations in assessment of the target STN and GPi.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Reliable identification of the anatomic borders of the STN is thus a critical step in stereotactic procedures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%