The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2017.2697965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the Optimal Location of Terror Response Facilities Under the Risk of Disruption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show that the proposed model in this paper is more reliable than Meng et al. (2017) under facility risk and malicious attacks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We show that the proposed model in this paper is more reliable than Meng et al. (2017) under facility risk and malicious attacks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Meng et al. (2017) develop a mixed integer programming formulation for the location of terror response facilities and employ the “level‐r” assignment to address the unexpected facility disruption. Another strand of literature managing the risk of disruption is the fortification of reliability for existing facilities focusing on the resource allocation in the existing network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cavdur et al in [16] has deliberated on a facility location problem for disaster operation management, and the proposed approach for solution is based on a deterministic model. Meng et al determine the optimal location facilities for the terrorist attack in terms of emergency response in [17]. The study however contains the assumptions of boundless limitations, which are not practical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%