2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the optimal clinical cutoff on the CES-D for depression in a community corrections sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Correlations between all scales administered for this report are presented in Table 1. According to the CESD, 64 individuals endorsed clinical levels of depression based on a cut-off value of 21 [56]. In addition, 78 individuals endorsed clinical levels of social anxiety according to the LSAS based on a cut-off value of 60 [57].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlations between all scales administered for this report are presented in Table 1. According to the CESD, 64 individuals endorsed clinical levels of depression based on a cut-off value of 21 [56]. In addition, 78 individuals endorsed clinical levels of social anxiety according to the LSAS based on a cut-off value of 60 [57].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the p-values of the CES-D scores in the FR group decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) compared to that of FL groups (p < 0.001) after the intervention (Table 1). The CES-D is a widely used clinical testing tool for the presence of major depression and is known to be a good choice when sampling young adults with high levels of depressive symptoms [49,50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the tasks administered, Stroop color-word [interference] was the most difficult. Third, we used the same CES-D cut-off for men and women though some argue in favor of a lower cut-off for men than women 63 . Whether a different pattern of findings would emerge with sex-specific cutoffs is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%