2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-013-0898-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the mechanical properties of hazel forks by testing their component parts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…bras., Brasília, v.52, n.11, p.969-976, nov. 2017 DOI: 10.1590/S0100-204X2017001100002 fraction of these materials (Table 2). This results in the higher basic density and better mechanical properties of fiber (Vincent et al, 2014) and wood (Slater & Ennos, 2013) and, with a smaller microfibril angle, improves the resistance of wood to breakage and tree resistance to wind. On account of these characteristics, these materials are more suited for areas with a high incidence of wind damage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…bras., Brasília, v.52, n.11, p.969-976, nov. 2017 DOI: 10.1590/S0100-204X2017001100002 fraction of these materials (Table 2). This results in the higher basic density and better mechanical properties of fiber (Vincent et al, 2014) and wood (Slater & Ennos, 2013) and, with a smaller microfibril angle, improves the resistance of wood to breakage and tree resistance to wind. On account of these characteristics, these materials are more suited for areas with a high incidence of wind damage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Materials with a lower lumen diameter and higher cell wall thickness corresponded to clones that had smaller damaged area by winds. The fibers have structural function in hardwoods and their morphology influenced the mechanical properties of wood (Slater & Ennos, 2013). The lumen diameter and cell wall thickness had a different influence on the mechanical properties of wood.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a more recent study, Buckley et al (2015) showed that diameter ratio of branch and branch strength was significantly correlated with each other, but there was a significant negative relationship, in that, higher diameter ratio of the branches failed at lower breaking stresses. A study by Slater and Ennos (2013) also found that diameter ratio is also an important parameter affecting how the forks fail. They suggested that compression failure at the outside of the forks (type I failure) occurred before fracture more often when the diameter ratio was 65-80%, whereas forks split before compression failure occurred (type II failure) more often at diameter ratios over 80% (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a In type I mode of failure, the first stage of failure exhibits yielding of wood under the compression of the outer edge of the smaller branch of the fork, prior to the second stage of failure, which is the splitting of the wood at the apex of the joint. b Type II mode of failure in tree forks exhibits only one stage of failure, immediately starting with the splitting of the tissues under tension at the fork apex (Slater and Ennos 2013) the bifurcation. The aim of the study was to investigate how forks are designed and how they fail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation