2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the importance of model calibration for forecasting absolute/relative changes in streamflow from LULC and climate changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Urban and agricultural areas continually increased for all the years under review. Urban area extent of 13 37.6% making it the land use type to have received the most significant reduction for the period under study. The reduction in rangeland was mainly due to its conversion into agricultural and urban land uses.…”
Section: Land Use Change Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Urban and agricultural areas continually increased for all the years under review. Urban area extent of 13 37.6% making it the land use type to have received the most significant reduction for the period under study. The reduction in rangeland was mainly due to its conversion into agricultural and urban land uses.…”
Section: Land Use Change Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of hydrologic models offers the advantage of spatially mapping the patterns of hydrological consequences resulting from LULC changes and allows for the comparison of basinal changes in hydrological components with basinal scale changes in LULC. Numerous studies have illustrated the significant advantages in the application of hydrologic models such as the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) [5,[13][14][15][16][17][18], Système Hydrologique Européen (MIKE-SHE) [19], Distributed Hydrology-Soil-Vegetation Model (DHSVM) [20], the Precipitation Runoff Modelling System (PRMS) [21] and the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) model [22] in assessing the impacts of LULC on hydrology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study based on the relationship between precipitation and runoff from 1966 to 1970 showed that runoff mainly decreased due to precipitation before the 2000s and due to human activity thereafter, which became dominant (with a contribution of greater than 76 %) (Zhang et al, 2011). The different results reported by Zuo et al (2014) and Liang et al (2015) suggest that assessing the impacts of LULC and climate changes on runoff in relatively large basins (over 1000 km 2 ) is difficult (Chawla and Mujumdar, 2015;Peng et al, 2015b) due to their complex effects on streamflow (Fu et al, 2007) and the variable boundary conditions (Chen et al, 2011;Niraula et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, it has been proven that calibration is not necessary for the SWAT model to determine the direction of changes in streamflow due to LULC changes, and that only spatially distributed calibration procedures can improve model accuracy. There is also little difference between uncalibrated models and models calibrated with a single output in predicting relative changes in streamflow [37].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%