2014 37th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/mipro.2014.6859754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the impact of demographic features in predicting student success in Croatia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As examples of (1), some researchers [40,47] assess the quality of their regression models using the models themselves. Exemplifying (2), other authors [11,51] generate predictive models and provide prediction results. However, those authors test their models on a test set pulled from the same cohort on which training occurs, which may cause the models to overfit to that cohort.…”
Section: Institution-and Program-level Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As examples of (1), some researchers [40,47] assess the quality of their regression models using the models themselves. Exemplifying (2), other authors [11,51] generate predictive models and provide prediction results. However, those authors test their models on a test set pulled from the same cohort on which training occurs, which may cause the models to overfit to that cohort.…”
Section: Institution-and Program-level Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] Institution [40] Institution [47] Institution [11] Institution [51] Institution [21] Program [44] Program [1] Program [19] Program [42] Program [27] Course [41] Course [53] Course [6] Course [20] Course [52] Course [8] Course [4] Course [24] Course [2] Course [10] Course…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, there are number of studies in this research process have been accomplished that uses various methodologies and techniques for the evaluation of student's performance. These comprise Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) [21], decision tree algorithms [27], Naive Bayes [28] have used "key" democratic variables of students and their academic grade for the performance prediction of students in open university based on six different algorithms of linear regression, neural networks, model trees and support vector machine. A hybrid algorithm has been implemented in [3] by using the concept of clustering and decision tree algorithm for the classification of the data samples.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common approach for building such prediction models is to train a machine-learning algorithm with student performance data collected from the final years of high school combined with students' demographic data. It has been shown such data are indeed good predictors of success at a critical point such as the end of the first year of college studies ( [6], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33]). However, much of the demographic data seldom changes and academic performance history from earlier years never does.…”
Section: One-off Versus Continuous Prediction -The Case Of Summative mentioning
confidence: 99%