2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01477.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the double‐K fracture parameters for three‐point bending notched concrete beams using weight function

Abstract: A B S T R A C T Parameters of universal form of weight functions having four terms and five terms are derived for edge cracks in finite width of plate. The standard Tada Green's function is taken as the basis for the derivation. The shape of universal form of weight functions considered enables closed form expressions for cohesive toughness of three-point bending test geometry of notched concrete beams due to linear cohesive stress distribution in the fictitious fracture zone. This solution provides a viable m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the results presented by authors [37], it can be seen that the error in results of K IC ini and K IC un for many specimens is more than ±20% which needs further attention for the validity of simplified extreme peak load method. It has been established from the extensive experimental and numerical studies [20][21][22][23][24][25][26]30] that the values of double -K fracture parameters (K IC ini and K IC un ) determined using experimental method and conventional analytical methods (GaussChebyshev integral method, weight function method) are in excellent agreement. Hence, in authors' opinion, the conventional analytical methods (Gauss-Chebyshev integral method, weight function method) can be considered as the standard analytical methods for determining the double -K fracture parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From the results presented by authors [37], it can be seen that the error in results of K IC ini and K IC un for many specimens is more than ±20% which needs further attention for the validity of simplified extreme peak load method. It has been established from the extensive experimental and numerical studies [20][21][22][23][24][25][26]30] that the values of double -K fracture parameters (K IC ini and K IC un ) determined using experimental method and conventional analytical methods (GaussChebyshev integral method, weight function method) are in excellent agreement. Hence, in authors' opinion, the conventional analytical methods (Gauss-Chebyshev integral method, weight function method) can be considered as the standard analytical methods for determining the double -K fracture parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The double-K fracture parameters using weight function method is based on linear asymptotic superposition assumption which uses linear elastic fracture mechanics formulas [26]. Here, WFM with four terms of universal weight function is used for computing the double-K fracture parameters of standard three point bend test (TPBT).…”
Section: A Weight Function Methods (Wfm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…38, 39 with the help of three parameters M 1 , M 2 and M 3 of weight function for single edge cracked specimen of finite width plate subjected to a pair of normal forces, with less than 3% error for 0 ≤ a/D ≤ 0.95 in the range of 0 ≤ x/a ≤ 0.98 (Kumar and Barai 2008a).…”
Section: Weight Function Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, a simplified approach (Xu and Reinhardt 2000) was proposed using two empirical formulae to obtain the double-K fracture parameters for TPBT configuration. Recently, a closed form equation for determining the values of double-K fracture parameters based on weight function approach (Kumar and Barai 2008a) was presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%