2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the conflict resolution strategies of university students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study made by Betty (1998) in selected USA schools found that about 25% engaged in compromising and 26% in collaborating as major conflict management styles. Dincyürek et al (2009Dincyürek et al ( , p. 1209) also added that compromising followed by collaborating were the most frequently used strategies for university students. Accommodating was the least frequently used strategy in handling conflicts.…”
Section: Discussion On Conflict Management Stylesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A previous study made by Betty (1998) in selected USA schools found that about 25% engaged in compromising and 26% in collaborating as major conflict management styles. Dincyürek et al (2009Dincyürek et al ( , p. 1209) also added that compromising followed by collaborating were the most frequently used strategies for university students. Accommodating was the least frequently used strategy in handling conflicts.…”
Section: Discussion On Conflict Management Stylesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although conflict hinders the attainment of one's goals, the consequences, however, might be beneficial if it brings help in the form of new insight for the groups. In relation to this, Dincyürek, Yeliz and Beidoglu (2009) and Waithaka (2015) argued that conflict has positive aspects: it helps individuals in knowing themselves, enhancing their awareness of others' characteristics, increases energy and motivation for problem solving, making life more interesting, and helps to solve small problems that could grow into big issues. However, Campbell, Carbally and Nustrand (1983), on the other hand, stated that conflicts are a normal segment of daily life; yet, it is considered as negative when it causes disagreements, stress, social chaos, destruction and violence between groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the clash could have different positive and negative aspects (Kıralp, Dincyürek, & Beidoğlu, 2009). Kıralp et al (2009) mentioned the positive aspects such as it helps to self-knowledge, gain experience in solving problems with motivation, recognizing and understanding others in a better way, learn to solve small challenges before they convert into big problems. Furthermore, Campbell, Bridges, and Nystrand (1997) argued that clash is a normal part of regular life if it causes negative aspects such as stress, nonconformity, social anarchy, severity, and ruin between groups.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keywords: Teaching learning process; alternative resolution of disputes; constructivism; active learning Introducción Un conflicto puede entenderse como una situación en la que una o más personas no pueden ponerse de acuerdo en relación con un asunto; típicamente, estas situaciones surgen cuando se confrontan deseos, instintos, necesidades y puntos de vista (Kiralp, Dincyürek y Beidoglu, 2009). Si bien el conflicto usualmente es entendido como una situación que comporta efectos negativos a quienes se involucran en él, Mc-Farland (1992) afirma que el conflicto es productivo o destructivo dependiendo de las habilidades que las partes tengan para gestionarlo y, actualmente, se insiste justamente en que los conflictos pueden ser fundamentalmente gestionados en lugar de resueltos, pues estos son parte de lo que implica ser humano (Kiralp, Dincyürek y Beidoglu, 2009). El conflicto es inevitable pero no necesariamente negativo (Collins, 2002).…”
Section: Analysis Of Teaching Experiences and Programs For Conflict Runclassified