Abstract:We studied the serologic response to the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine at four weeks after the second dose in patients with RRMS treated with rituximab with extended-interval dosing ( n = 26). At four weeks, 73% of patients were seropositive. No patient without B cells at the first dose ( n = 4) was seropositive. Four of seven (57%) patients with B-cell proportion >0% and ≤5% were seropositive. All patients with B-cell proportion >5% ( n = 15) were seropositive. In all patients, quantitative ELISA measures after… Show more
“…Some studies report that the timing of vaccination versus infusion affects the likelihood of seropositivity, whereas others do not. The presence of CD19 + and/or CD20 + cells were associated with an increased likelihood of antibody response in some studies 9–12,16,17 but not in others 18,19,36 ; the presence of CD19 + /CD20 + cells is somewhat correlated with timing 11,15,17,19,50 but was not consistently in all patients 16 …”
Introduction
Responses to SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination in patients with MS (pwMS) varies by disease‐modifying therapies (DMTs). We perform a meta‐analysis and systematic review of immune response to SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines in pwMS.
Methods
Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase from January 1, 2019‐December 31, 2021, excluding prior SARS‐CoV‐2 infections. The meta‐analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines were applied. The data were pooled using a fixed‐effects model.
Results
Eight‐hundred sixty‐four healthy controls and 2203 pwMS from 31 studies were included. Antibodies were detected in 93% healthy controls (HCs), and 77% pwMS, with >93% responses in all DMTs (interferon‐beta, glatiramer acetate, cladribine, natalizumab, dimethyl fumarate, alemtuzumab, and teriflunomide) except for 72% sphingosine‐1‐phosphate modulators (S1PM) and 44% anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). T‐cell responses were detected in most anti‐CD20 and decreased in S1PM. Higher antibody response was observed in mRNA vaccines (99.7% HCs) versus non‐mRNA vaccines (HCs: 72% inactivated virus; pwMS: 86% vector, 59% inactivated virus). A multivariate logistic regression model to predict vaccine response demonstrated that mRNA versus non‐mRNA vaccines had a 3.4 odds ratio (OR) for developing immunity in anti‐CD20 (p = 0.0052) and 7.9 OR in pwMS on S1PM or CD20 mAbs (p < 0.0001). Antibody testing timing did not affect antibody detection.
Conclusion
Antibody responses are decreased in S1PM and anti‐CD20; however, cellular responses were positive in most anti‐CD20 with decreased T cell responses in S1PM. mRNA vaccines had increased seroconversion rates compared to non‐RNA vaccines. Further investigation in how DMTs affect vaccine immunity are needed.
“…Some studies report that the timing of vaccination versus infusion affects the likelihood of seropositivity, whereas others do not. The presence of CD19 + and/or CD20 + cells were associated with an increased likelihood of antibody response in some studies 9–12,16,17 but not in others 18,19,36 ; the presence of CD19 + /CD20 + cells is somewhat correlated with timing 11,15,17,19,50 but was not consistently in all patients 16 …”
Introduction
Responses to SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination in patients with MS (pwMS) varies by disease‐modifying therapies (DMTs). We perform a meta‐analysis and systematic review of immune response to SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines in pwMS.
Methods
Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase from January 1, 2019‐December 31, 2021, excluding prior SARS‐CoV‐2 infections. The meta‐analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines were applied. The data were pooled using a fixed‐effects model.
Results
Eight‐hundred sixty‐four healthy controls and 2203 pwMS from 31 studies were included. Antibodies were detected in 93% healthy controls (HCs), and 77% pwMS, with >93% responses in all DMTs (interferon‐beta, glatiramer acetate, cladribine, natalizumab, dimethyl fumarate, alemtuzumab, and teriflunomide) except for 72% sphingosine‐1‐phosphate modulators (S1PM) and 44% anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). T‐cell responses were detected in most anti‐CD20 and decreased in S1PM. Higher antibody response was observed in mRNA vaccines (99.7% HCs) versus non‐mRNA vaccines (HCs: 72% inactivated virus; pwMS: 86% vector, 59% inactivated virus). A multivariate logistic regression model to predict vaccine response demonstrated that mRNA versus non‐mRNA vaccines had a 3.4 odds ratio (OR) for developing immunity in anti‐CD20 (p = 0.0052) and 7.9 OR in pwMS on S1PM or CD20 mAbs (p < 0.0001). Antibody testing timing did not affect antibody detection.
Conclusion
Antibody responses are decreased in S1PM and anti‐CD20; however, cellular responses were positive in most anti‐CD20 with decreased T cell responses in S1PM. mRNA vaccines had increased seroconversion rates compared to non‐RNA vaccines. Further investigation in how DMTs affect vaccine immunity are needed.
“…With the outbreak of the COVID‐19 pandemic, concerns were raised regarding the impact of BCDTs on humoral and cellular immune response to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and vaccination [ 3 ]. Since then, several studies have reported a blunted antibody response, albeit a largely intact T‐cell response, in persons with MS (pwMS) treated with BCDTs [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 ]. Failure to seroconvert has in particular been observed in pwMS who received an anti‐CD20 infusion close to the time of vaccination [ 4 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a correlation between time since last dose and B‐cell repletion exists at the group level, variable total treatment duration and individual differences may impact on B‐cell repopulation dynamics [ 17 ]. Therefore, an ideal dosing interval to optimize vaccine response that fits all patients seems unlikely, and there is a need for robust biomarkers that can predict vaccine efficacy while maintaining the effect of anti‐CD20 treatment on relapse rates [ 10 , 12 ].…”
Background and purpose
Recent findings document a blunted humoral response to SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination in patients on anti‐CD20 treatment. Although most patients develop a cellular response, it is still important to identify predictors of seroconversion to optimize vaccine responses.
Methods
We determined antibody responses after SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination in a real‐world cohort of multiple sclerosis patients (
n
= 94) treated with anti‐CD20, mainly rituximab, with variable treatment duration (median = 2.9, range = 0.4–9.6 years) and time from last anti‐CD20 infusion to vaccination (median = 190, range = 60–1032 days).
Results
We find that presence of B cells and/or rituximab in blood predict seroconversion better than time since last infusion. Using multiple logistic regression, presence of >0.5% B cells increased probability of seroconversion with an odds ratio (OR) of 5.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0–28.1,
p
= 0.055), whereas the corresponding OR for ≥6 months since last infusion was 1.45 (95% CI = 0.20–10.15,
p
= 0.705). In contrast, detectable rituximab levels were negatively associated with seroconversion (OR = 0.05, 95% CI = 0.002–0.392,
p
= 0.012). Furthermore, naïve and memory IgG
+
B cells correlated with antibody levels. Although retreatment with rituximab at 4 weeks or more after booster depleted spike‐specific B cells, it did not noticeably affect the rate of decline in antibody titers. Interferon‐γ and/or interleukin‐13 T‐cell responses to the spike S1 domain were observed in most patients, but with no correlation to spike antibody levels.
Conclusions
These findings are relevant for providing individualized guidance to patients and planning of vaccination schemes, in turn optimizing benefit–risk with anti‐CD20.
“…Previous studies have shown that even minimal B-cell reconstitution may correlate with an increased humoral response to COVID-19 vaccination. ( Disanto et al, 2021 , Apostolidis et al, 2021 , Rico et al, 2021 , van Kempen et al, 2021 ) In one study, while 1 of 36 patients with undetectable B cells seroconverted after vaccination, 45% of patients with between 0 and 1% of CD19+ B cells seroconverted. ( Mrak et al, 2021 ) Studies have also found a significant correlation between time since last anti-CD20 infusion as well as length of anti-CD20 therapy and SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.