2022
DOI: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the Attitudes of Medicine Faculty Instructors Toward LGBT Individuals

Abstract: Introduction:It has been shown that lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) patients are not able to receive the health care they need due to in part homophobia among health care providers. The aim of this study is to determine the attitudes toward LGBT people by medical school faculty members, the educators of the health care providers.Methods:The study was designed as cross-sectional, using the Hudson-Ricketts homophobia scale and a questionnaire prepared by the researchers and conducted in two different … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sex-based analysis revealed a higher average increase among female participants compared to their male counterparts. The observation that females also reported a higher average pre-test score suggests a potential baseline difference in attitudes to transgender health topics ( 42 , 43 ), further emphasizing the importance of tailoring educational interventions to address diverse starting points among participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex-based analysis revealed a higher average increase among female participants compared to their male counterparts. The observation that females also reported a higher average pre-test score suggests a potential baseline difference in attitudes to transgender health topics ( 42 , 43 ), further emphasizing the importance of tailoring educational interventions to address diverse starting points among participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, these measures are essential in identifying growth areas and improving therapist training and infrastructure for LGBTQ+ services. Unfortunately, limited tools are available to assess the services provided by mental healthcare providers, particularly concerning LGBTQ+ clients [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. The lack of measures in this area further stymie efforts to advance policies, programs, and practices designed to increase healthcare workforce readiness to serve LGBTQ+ populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%