Determining the Association between Language and Cognitive Tests in Poststroke Aphasia

Abstract

BackgroundIndividuals with aphasia are often excluded from studies exploring poststroke cognition because so many of the standard cognitive assessments rely on language ability. Our primary objective was to examine the association between performance on cognitive tests and performance on comprehension and naming tests in poststroke aphasia. Second, we aimed to determine the association between language performance and a real-life measure of cognition (Kettle Test). Third, we explored the feasibility of administering cognitive tests in aphasia.MethodsThirty-six participants with poststroke aphasia and 32 controls were assessed on a battery of pen-and-paper cognitive tests recommended in stroke. Auditory comprehension was measured using the Comprehensive Aphasia Test and naming was measured using the Boston Naming Test. Twenty-two community dwelling participants with aphasia and controls were also asked to complete the Kettle Test. Multiple linear regressions were used to explore the relationship between language performance and performance on the cognitive tests. Feasibility was determined by quantifying missing data.ResultsThe cognitive tests with the highest variance accounted for by auditory comprehension and naming were animal fluency (R2 = 0.67, R2 = 0.78) and the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (recognition discrimination index) (R2 = 0.65, R2 = 0.78). All cognitive tests were significantly associated with auditory comprehension and naming, except for the Star Cancellation Test and the Kettle Test. Thirty-three percent of participants with aphasia were unable to complete all the cognitive tests.ConclusionLanguage and non-linguistic cognitive processes are often interrelated. Most pen-and-paper cognitive tests were significantly associated with both auditory comprehension and naming, even in tests that do not require a verbal response. Language performance was not significantly associated with a real-life cognitive performance measure. Task instructions, stimuli, and responses for completion need to be tailored for individuals with aphasia to minimize the influence of language deficits when testing non-linguistic cognitive performance.

Exploring the Viability of NARNIA with Cognitive–Communication Difficulties: A Pilot Study

“…11,12 The increased focus on discourse has also turned attention to the role of cognition where planning, organizing, and monitoring longer sequences of output has provided an opportunity to actively consider the interaction between language and cognition in understanding and managing aphasia. While cognition has been recognized as important in the overall presentation of aphasia for many years, 13 the recent redefining of aphasia in the context of neural multifunctionality, that is, the dynamic and reciprocal interaction between language and (nonlanguage) cognition, 14 has raised several important issues for aphasia treatment. These include, for example, whether, and which, impaired and residual cognitive processes both interact with and support aphasia recovery, and how we might begin to systematically integrate cognitive processes into interventions for people with aphasia.…”

The importance of situated language use for aphasia rehabilitation

“…There is evidence to suggest that cognitive control is involved in a person's ability monitor one's own behaviour and detect problems in message transmission, to evaluate alternative methods of communication and/or to switch to another modality (Purdy, 2002). A number of studies have found switching impairments in PWA (e.g., Frankel et al 2007;Chiou & Kennedy 2009;Hachioui et al 2014;Wall et al 2017 as well as generation and selection of appropriate strategies (Frankel et al, 2007), both skills that are highly relevant when trying to switch from one modality to the next. Executive functioning has been linked to successful use of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) (Nicholas et al, 2005(Nicholas et al, , 2011, while impaired executive functioning has been related to lack of switching between modalities during communication, despite having learned to use different modalities separately (Purdy et al, 1994).…”

Estudo exploratório do ensino da neuropsicologia nos currículos dos cursos de graduação em fonoaudiologia

“…The relationship between speech-language pathology and neuropsychology can be illustrated by giving some specific neurological conditions as examples. Aphasias, for instance, are language disorders caused, most often, by stroke (6,7) . The neuropsychology contribution to aphasias is the use of cognitive and language evaluation batteries to diagnose and plan speech therapy for these cases (6,8) .…”