2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-011-2299-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining storm sampling requirements for improving precision of annual load estimates of nutrients from a small forested watershed

Abstract: This study sought to determine the lowest number of storm events required for adequate estimation of annual nutrient loads from a forested watershed using the regression equation between cumulative load (∑L) and cumulative stream discharge (∑Q). Hydrological surveys were conducted for 4 years, and stream water was sampled sequentially at 15-60-min intervals during 24 h in 20 events, as well as weekly in a small forested watershed. The bootstrap sampling technique was used to determine the regression (∑L-∑Q) eq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed that the event-based export of P can contribute up to 40% to the seasonal and 19% to the annual export fluxes, which highlights the importance of monitoring stormflow events for flux estimation and process understanding. These results support the findings of numerous studies [9,11,18,31] which have found that time discrete sampling schemes at the monthly or bi-weekly time scale are unable to capture short-term changes in solute concentrations, and therefore can lead to a bias in load calculations. Ide et al [18] suggested that a certain number of monitored stormflow events are necessary to quantify export fluxes with low bias.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It was observed that the event-based export of P can contribute up to 40% to the seasonal and 19% to the annual export fluxes, which highlights the importance of monitoring stormflow events for flux estimation and process understanding. These results support the findings of numerous studies [9,11,18,31] which have found that time discrete sampling schemes at the monthly or bi-weekly time scale are unable to capture short-term changes in solute concentrations, and therefore can lead to a bias in load calculations. Ide et al [18] suggested that a certain number of monitored stormflow events are necessary to quantify export fluxes with low bias.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These results support the findings of numerous studies [9,11,18,31] which have found that time discrete sampling schemes at the monthly or bi-weekly time scale are unable to capture short-term changes in solute concentrations, and therefore can lead to a bias in load calculations. Ide et al [18] suggested that a certain number of monitored stormflow events are necessary to quantify export fluxes with low bias. The results of our study also suggest that the differences in the flux estimates between the selected methods are smaller than the differences due to the sampling scheme (i.e., see the error bars in Figures 3 and 4).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations