2011
DOI: 10.1142/s0217732311036280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining Source Cumulants in Femtoscopy With Gram–charlier and Edgeworth Series

Abstract: Lowest-order cumulants provide important information on the shape of the emission source in femtoscopy. For the simple case of noninteracting identical particles, we show how the fourth-order source cumulant can be determined from measured cumulants in momentum space. The textbook Gram-Charlier series is found to be highly inaccurate, while the related Edgeworth series provides increasingly accurate estimates. Ordering of terms compatible with the Central Limit Theorem appears to play a crucial role even for n… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cramér compared the two expansion in a series of papers, and deemed the Edgeworth expansion to be superior, see, for example, Cramér (). Formally, when a Gaussian distribution is employed as reference distribution, Blinnikov and Moessner () show that the Edgeworth expansion achieves a better approximation for near‐Gaussian distribution, and Eggers, de Kock, and Schmiegel () highlights how poorly the Gram–Charlier expansion is at approximating a symmetric Normal Inverse Gaussian distribution, while the Edgeworth expansion performs well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cramér compared the two expansion in a series of papers, and deemed the Edgeworth expansion to be superior, see, for example, Cramér (). Formally, when a Gaussian distribution is employed as reference distribution, Blinnikov and Moessner () show that the Edgeworth expansion achieves a better approximation for near‐Gaussian distribution, and Eggers, de Kock, and Schmiegel () highlights how poorly the Gram–Charlier expansion is at approximating a symmetric Normal Inverse Gaussian distribution, while the Edgeworth expansion performs well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be helpful to use them, as we have done here, merely as part of parametrisations of data to which they show some resemblance. More systematic use in Gram-Charlier or other expansions will be faced with issues inherent in all asymptotic series [7,8].…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%