2017
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining RUSLE P‐ and C‐factors for stone bunds and trenches in rangeland and cropland, North Ethiopia

Abstract: The implementation of soil and water conservation (SWC) measures in the Ethiopian Highlands is a top priority to reduce soil erosion rates. However, the effectiveness of these measures for different hillslope gradients and land use conditions remains poorly understood. This study addresses this knowledge gap by determining support practice (P) and cover‐management (C) factors of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation for commonly used SWC structures in semi‐arid environments. The factor values were calculate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(143 reference statements)
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subhatu et al (2018) used a similar approach for evaluating the efficiency of fanya juu bunds on water and tillage erosion in Ethiopia. Taye et al (2018) also focused on Ethiopia, assessing the effectiveness of soil water conservation measures by plot monitoring in semi‐arid range lands and croplands. They provided time‐varying cover‐management and conservation practice factors (C and P) of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), commonly applied in erosion‐related analyses.…”
Section: Timeliness and Relevance Of The Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subhatu et al (2018) used a similar approach for evaluating the efficiency of fanya juu bunds on water and tillage erosion in Ethiopia. Taye et al (2018) also focused on Ethiopia, assessing the effectiveness of soil water conservation measures by plot monitoring in semi‐arid range lands and croplands. They provided time‐varying cover‐management and conservation practice factors (C and P) of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), commonly applied in erosion‐related analyses.…”
Section: Timeliness and Relevance Of The Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The revised version of the Universal Soil Loss Equation, that is, RUSLE (Galdino et al, ), was used to calculate the total amount of soil retention ( B ): B=R·K·L·S·()1C·P, where R is the rainfall erosivity factor, calculated using Wischmeier's empirical formula (B. Fu et al, ); K is the soil erodibility factor, calculated by the K ‐value estimation method proposed in the EPIC model (Polyakov, Fares, Kubo, Jacobi, & Smith, ); L is the slope length factor, calculated by an empirical formula that combines horizontal slope length and slope length index (Kinnell, ); S is the slope steepness factor, calculated according to McCool's classic slope formula based on the gradient (Nakil & Khire, ); C is the crop management factor, obtained by the vegetation coverage, which can be calculated from the average annual normalized difference vegetation index; and P is the support practice factor. Referring to previous studies, the P value of various types of land cover was determined (Panagos et al, ; Taye et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…stone bunds, soil trenches and grassed lynchets) are widely implemented across Ethiopia (e.g. Haregeweyn et al, 2015;Taye et al 2013Taye et al , 2018, no comprehensive spatial databases of these measures exist. However, since they are mainly implemented on cropland, it was expected that this variable could provide an indication on the potential effect of conservation structures on gully head development (e.g.…”
Section: Considered Predictor Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%