2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2000.tb00703.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining replication for discrimination among microbial communities in environmental samples using community-level physiological profiles

Abstract: A statistical approach was employed to assess microbial community variability within a single 4-l water sample and among 10 independent 4-l water samples from a single location using community-level physiological profiles. Power calculations demonstrated that duplicate analyses could distinguish between two different locations at two times during the year. Variability associated with replicates from a single container or from different containers was nearly the same for the two sites examined. Duplicate assays… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Water samples were collected in 50-mL, sterile, plastic, centrifuge tubes and immediately capped. All ponds were sampled in 30 min or less, and each sample was directly inoculated into the 96 microwells (150 L of sample per well) of the EcoPlate within 30 min of collection (Lowit et al 2000;Preston-Mafham et al 2002) with an eight-channel pipettor. EcoPlates were incubated at 21 ± 2 • C in the dark (Christian and Lind 2006) for a maximum of 224 h or until AWCD ≥ 1 (Weber and Legge 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water samples were collected in 50-mL, sterile, plastic, centrifuge tubes and immediately capped. All ponds were sampled in 30 min or less, and each sample was directly inoculated into the 96 microwells (150 L of sample per well) of the EcoPlate within 30 min of collection (Lowit et al 2000;Preston-Mafham et al 2002) with an eight-channel pipettor. EcoPlates were incubated at 21 ± 2 • C in the dark (Christian and Lind 2006) for a maximum of 224 h or until AWCD ≥ 1 (Weber and Legge 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of Biolog microplates for microbial community analysis has several indispensable problems [15]. Among the criticisms was the lack of replication and statistical weakness [16]. An alternative to Biolog microplates, the Biolog EcoPlates can analyze 31 substrates that were selected from past environmental applications and arranged on the three blocks in a single microplate for triplicate analyses; these EcoPlates potentially have great merit for microbial community level physiological profiling and have been used to assess functional diversity among various environments [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative values were set to zero. The data were normalized (scaled) by dividing each OD value by the AWCD [15,17], and the adjusted OD values were used for statistical analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we used the original concept of data analysis (AWCD scaling) suggested by Garland and Mills [15]. This concept has been critically discussed [26,27], but recent evaluations of data handling support the usefulness of the method [17,23].…”
Section: Effects On Functional Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%