2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining pomegranate water and nitrogen requirements with drip irrigation

Abstract: Despite being an ancient crop there is limited knowledge on the water and nitrogen (N) requirements of pomegranate. We conducted research at the University of California, Kearney Agricultural Research and Extension Center (KARE) to determine the water and N requirements of a developing pomegranate orchard. Pomegranate trees (Punica granatum L. var. Wonderful) were planted in 2010. The irrigation treatments were surface drip irrigation (DI) and subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) with three N sub-treatments (N app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
3
9

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
47
3
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The field treatments included two main irrigation treatments as surface drip irrigation (DI) and subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) and three N application rates as sub-treatments. The findings on treatment effects on yield, N requirement, and weed as well as C and N dynamics from this field research are reported in Ayars et al [17] and Tirado-Corbalá et al [18], respectively. Conclusions included that although yields were not significantly different between the two irrigation systems, SDI used less water with much lower weed pressure than DI.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The field treatments included two main irrigation treatments as surface drip irrigation (DI) and subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) and three N application rates as sub-treatments. The findings on treatment effects on yield, N requirement, and weed as well as C and N dynamics from this field research are reported in Ayars et al [17] and Tirado-Corbalá et al [18], respectively. Conclusions included that although yields were not significantly different between the two irrigation systems, SDI used less water with much lower weed pressure than DI.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Wang et al [21] reported that increased soil moisture stimulated the growth of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and nitrite reducer (nirK) and total N 2 O emissions were positively correlated to ammonia-oxidizing bacteria abundance. The SDI also resulted in higher water use efficiency and much lower weed pressure Ayars et al [17] as well as higher N use efficiency Tirado-Corbalá et al [18]. All the benefits plus the reduced N 2 O emissions in this study make SDI preferable to the DI.…”
Section: Mitigation Of N 2 O Emission Through Irrigation and Fertimentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations