2021
DOI: 10.3390/bios11100353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining Particle Size and Position in a Coplanar Electrode Setup Using Measured Opacity for Microfluidic Cytometry

Abstract: Microfluidic impedance flow cytometers enable high-throughput, non-invasive, and label-free detection of single-cells. Cytometers with coplanar electrodes are easy and cheap to fabricate, but are sensitive to positional differences of passing particles, owing to the inhomogeneous electric field. We present a novel particle height compensation method, which employs the dependence of measured electrical opacity on particle height. The measured electrical opacity correlates with the particle height as a result of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, all results were based on processing a 0.5 and 12 MHz signal for which the previous method worked best. 9 These frequencies were chosen rather far apart to enhance the opacity effect. For size determination in flow cytometry it is required to operate below the β-dispersion of cells (<several MHz 9,22 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…So far, all results were based on processing a 0.5 and 12 MHz signal for which the previous method worked best. 9 These frequencies were chosen rather far apart to enhance the opacity effect. For size determination in flow cytometry it is required to operate below the β-dispersion of cells (<several MHz 9,22 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 These frequencies were chosen rather far apart to enhance the opacity effect. For size determination in flow cytometry it is required to operate below the β-dispersion of cells (<several MHz 9,22 ). Therefore, we also have tested the model with a 0.5 and 1 MHz signal response (Figure 5) and we have observed a significant improvement for all particles compared to the previous method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations