2021
DOI: 10.3390/su13116471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining Optimal Dry Port Location for Seaport Rijeka Using AHP Decision-Making Methodology

Abstract: Seaport Rijeka is located and connected to the strategic EU TEN-T transport routes (Mediterranean and Baltic–Adriatic Corridor). Seaport Rijeka represents the shortest connection between Central and Central-Eastern Europe, and overseas destinations, by land and sea, and is in an excellent position to take advantage of its location. Being the largest and busiest seaport in Croatia, with constant increase in cargo traffic, especially container traffic, with inadequate and incomplete transport infrastructure that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have expanded the hub location problem by, for example, considering capacity constraints [14], budget constraints [15], dual decision-makers [16], traffic congestion [17], etc., to achieve more practical applications. Other researches focused on the exploration of solutions to hub location problems, such as analytic hierarchy process (AHP) decision-making [18], multi-criteria decision-making [19], improved or hybrid methods based on genetic algorithm [14,20], tabu search algorithm [21], benders decomposition [15] and other meta heuristics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have expanded the hub location problem by, for example, considering capacity constraints [14], budget constraints [15], dual decision-makers [16], traffic congestion [17], etc., to achieve more practical applications. Other researches focused on the exploration of solutions to hub location problems, such as analytic hierarchy process (AHP) decision-making [18], multi-criteria decision-making [19], improved or hybrid methods based on genetic algorithm [14,20], tabu search algorithm [21], benders decomposition [15] and other meta heuristics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Komchornrit ( 12 ) applied an integrated approach based on confirmatory factor analysis, categorical-based evaluation, and preference ranking organization to select dry ports. Bozicevic et al ( 13 ) determined locations for dry ports at three different distances by an analytical hierarchy process. A major disadvantage of the above approach is that the weights of the location criteria are based on human experience, which is difficult to measure precisely ( 14 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence there is a significant need for informed and comprehensive decision-making regarding its management. As already highlighted in the introduction, the AHP is a highly regarded MCDM method that has already been used in IT management research (Božičević et al, 2021;J. J. Wang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Analytic Hierarchy Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decision models for information technology (IT) outsourcing have already been developed (e.g., Faisal & Raza, 2016;Pakpahan et al, 2021); however, a review of existing literature shows that no such model has been developed for deliberation over outsourcing and internal (in-house) ISM. Although there are a large amount of multi-criteria decision-making models (MCDM) available in the literature (Kabir et al, 2014), AHP is among the most appropriate MCDM methods for solving complex problems (Božičević et al, 2021;Ishizaka & Siraj, 2018). Hence, it was used by several researchers in IT management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%