1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0262-8856(96)01113-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining optical flow using a differential method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To measure motion, for each pixel belonging to an object, we compute the spatiotemporal differential equations for optical flow approximation, in accordance with [18]. The average optical flow computed over all the pixels of an MVO blob is the figure we use to discriminate between MVOs and ghosts: In fact, MVOs should have significant motion, while ghosts should have a near-to-zero average optical flow since their motion is only apparent.…”
Section: Detecting Moving Objects Ghosts and Shadowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure motion, for each pixel belonging to an object, we compute the spatiotemporal differential equations for optical flow approximation, in accordance with [18]. The average optical flow computed over all the pixels of an MVO blob is the figure we use to discriminate between MVOs and ghosts: In fact, MVOs should have significant motion, while ghosts should have a near-to-zero average optical flow since their motion is only apparent.…”
Section: Detecting Moving Objects Ghosts and Shadowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, although (3) is derived from the gradient constraint equation, it does not necessarily impose it. For this purpose, we explicitly include the gradient constraint equation in our linear system to obtain (4) This yields a pixelwise formulation that includes both first-order and second-order constraints. In practice, due to various sources of error, (4) does not identically vanish.…”
Section: Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering all these factors and in accordance with the analysis of different algorithms and their benefits [24,25], the Lucas-Kanade method, which has good quality results with moderate computational cost, has been chosen. Specifically, the sequential implementation by Correia at the Biomedical Engineering Institute, Engineering School of the University of Porto [26,27] has been used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%