2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining model parameters for non-linear deep-bed filtration using laboratory pressure measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fall in pressure is attributed to fines straining and permeability blockage. Typically, the pressure across the core varies sharply, especially begins to drop during coreflood experiments (Vaz et al 2017). Additionally, recent research reports that rock core heterogeneity affects the CO 2 saturation, which consequently reduces the permeability and pressure across the core during multiphase flow (Oh et al 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fall in pressure is attributed to fines straining and permeability blockage. Typically, the pressure across the core varies sharply, especially begins to drop during coreflood experiments (Vaz et al 2017). Additionally, recent research reports that rock core heterogeneity affects the CO 2 saturation, which consequently reduces the permeability and pressure across the core during multiphase flow (Oh et al 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analogous inverse problem for the modified system (, , ) also involves breakthrough concentration c ( L , t ) that is measured by turbidimeter during corefloods with either suspension‐colloidal injection or high‐rate injection of colloid‐free water (Vaz et al, , ). Modern scanning computational tomography provides retention profile measurements s ( x , t k ), k = 1, 2 … at discrete moments (Arns, ; Arns et al, ; Yu et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If pressure drop across the core is measured during the suspension‐colloidal flow, the formation damage function k ( s ) can also be estimated in these experiments (Alvarez et al, ). Pressure measurements in intermediate core ports (so‐called three‐point pressure method) allows capturing either extra model functions or core heterogeneity (Vaz et al, , ). The permeability distribution can be estimated from the suspension‐colloidal flow tests with monitoring pressure along the core (Krause et al, ; Rabinovich, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the outlet 1 x  , the asymptotic error is greatest. These solutions make it possible to reduce the amount of experimental research and simplify the solution of the inverse problemobtaining system coefficients from laboratory measurements of suspended particles concentrations at the porous medium outlet [20,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%