2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.07.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining meteoroid bulk densities using a plasma scattering model with high-power large-aperture radar data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from this figure that the ensemble of electrons model is in reasonably good agreement with the FDTD simulations for the range of masses between 0.01 and 1000 micrograms, where at low velocities the RCS from the FDTD simulations is at most a factor of 0.1 smaller than that resulting from the coherent scattering approach. The FDTD model assumes a Gaussian electron density distribution (Close et al 2012), and from these results it appears that coherent scattering works reasonably well as an approximation when the HE is underdense, that is, the peak plasma frequency (w p,max ) is lower than the radar frequency (w p = f 2 0 0 ). For this case, the head plasma should emulate coherent scattering as the radar wave is able to penetrate the plasma and be seen by all of the head plasma electrons, which each scatter the radar wave independently and coherently.…”
Section: Size Of Meteor Hementioning
confidence: 86%
“…It can be seen from this figure that the ensemble of electrons model is in reasonably good agreement with the FDTD simulations for the range of masses between 0.01 and 1000 micrograms, where at low velocities the RCS from the FDTD simulations is at most a factor of 0.1 smaller than that resulting from the coherent scattering approach. The FDTD model assumes a Gaussian electron density distribution (Close et al 2012), and from these results it appears that coherent scattering works reasonably well as an approximation when the HE is underdense, that is, the peak plasma frequency (w p,max ) is lower than the radar frequency (w p = f 2 0 0 ). For this case, the head plasma should emulate coherent scattering as the radar wave is able to penetrate the plasma and be seen by all of the head plasma electrons, which each scatter the radar wave independently and coherently.…”
Section: Size Of Meteor Hementioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, routine operational worldwide head echo observations utilizing HPLA radar only began in earnest almost three decades later [ Pellinen‐Wannberg and Wannberg , ; Mathews et al , ; Close et al , ; Sato et al , ; Chau and Woodman , ; Janches et al , ; Sparks et al , ]. Because head echoes allow direct detection of the meteoroid flight in the atmosphere, they provide information about meteoroid changes during the actual entry process and so provide key information for understanding mass loss mechanisms [ Kero et al , ; Janches et al , ], electromagnetic plasma processes [ Dyrud et al , ], as well as enabling the quantification of the mass range of detected particles [ Close et al , ] and their effect in the upper atmosphere [ Fentzke and Janches , ; Gardner et al , ]. HPLA radars are characterized by their high peak transmitter power (≥1 MW) at VHF and UHF frequencies that range between 50 and 1200 MHz, and antenna apertures, in the form of arrays or dishes, that have areas ranging between ∼800 and 9 ×10 4 m 2 [ Janches et al , ] (see also section 5 and Table ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We scale the measurements relative to the median since it is less sensitive to outliers, especially since masses and bulk densities vary across 2 orders of magnitude between meteoroids. Based upon previous ALTAIR measurements, their respective median values are approximately m = 1.36 × 10 −5 g and ρm=0.450.3emgcm3 [ Close et al , , ]. The resulting estimated densities are shown in Figures and .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of radars to collect meteor data has been well established since the late 1940s [Hey et al, 1946], but the HPLA radars have yielded significant insights into the field of meteor physics [Pellinen-Wannberg and Wannberg, 1994;Janches et al, 2000;Close et al, 2000;Mathews et al, 2001;Oppenheim et al, 2008]. In particular, because of their ability to directly observe the velocity and deceleration of the head echo target, the masses and bulk densities of meteoroids can be derived [Close et al, 2005[Close et al, , 2012. Since atmospheric density is a major component to these calculations, meteoroids have been used as probes for atmospheric science before the advent of in situ monitoring [Opik, 1958].…”
Section: Meteoroids and Radar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%