2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5273(02)00108-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining manufacturing batch sizes for a lumpy delivery system with trend demand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, M ). A similar model with trend delivery quantities at a fixed interval delivery was presented in Diponegoro and Sarker (2002). The total cost is a polynomial function with decision variables M and m j ( j ¼ 1, 2, .…”
Section: Total Cost When Delivery Time Is a Non-linear Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…, M ). A similar model with trend delivery quantities at a fixed interval delivery was presented in Diponegoro and Sarker (2002). The total cost is a polynomial function with decision variables M and m j ( j ¼ 1, 2, .…”
Section: Total Cost When Delivery Time Is a Non-linear Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A search procedure was proposed to find minimum average cycle cost, from first cycle to the last one for a given time horizon. But the procedure in Diponegoro and Sarker (2002) might not find the optimal solution for the total cost in the full planning horizon. So, a different search algorithm is set up to solve our problem which can find better solution than the method in Diponegoro and Sarker (2002) by numerical examples in Section 6.…”
Section: Total Cost When Delivery Time Is a Non-linear Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Diponegoro and Sarker (2002), the life cycle of product is finite, therefore the development of inventory policy in each stage of the product life cycle should consider finite planning horizon. Many researches have been conducted for the development of inventory policy for the case of linear increasing demand pattern under finite planning horizon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%