2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining factors affecting congestion pricing acceptability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the final model, HEC and MHI had a statistically significant positive impact with respective standardized coefficients of 0.975 and 0.221. MHI was left in the model, although its impact was weak as it was statistically significant and the goal was to obtain a good measurement model (Allen et al, 2019;Milenković et al, 2019). The R 2 of this construct was 99.8%, indicating that the two predictors explained a high percentage of variability of WTP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the final model, HEC and MHI had a statistically significant positive impact with respective standardized coefficients of 0.975 and 0.221. MHI was left in the model, although its impact was weak as it was statistically significant and the goal was to obtain a good measurement model (Allen et al, 2019;Milenković et al, 2019). The R 2 of this construct was 99.8%, indicating that the two predictors explained a high percentage of variability of WTP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the remaining six coping strategies lead to increased burnout, while the coping strategy Positive Reframing decreases burnout. Some of the coefficients are quite low and close to zero, but they were not removed from the model as we aimed to create a model of high quality and find as many predictors as possible 25 . The coefficients on the original sample and the mean coefficients do not differ indicating that the coefficients are stable.…”
Section: Validation Of the Proposed Conceptual Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because national road pricing is also an important source of infrastructurerelated funds in some cases, determining the price usually involves a trade-off between a minimum toll rate that users can afford while providing a sufficient return on investment (Chi et al 2017). Thus, road pricing for motorways is distinct from the pricing of urban roads, often referred to as congestion charging, implying its higher emphasis on different policy objectives, with urban users also having different travel preferences (Milenković et al 2019).…”
Section: Background Of User Perspectives On Road Pricingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second part of the questionnaire focused on the WTP and MAP questions, similarly to previous studies (e.g., Odeck and Kjerkreit 2010;Chen and Wen 2014;Glavić et al 2017;Gomez et al 2017;Jou et al 2012;Milenković et al 2019). WTP and MAP questions were first asked in relation to DB pricing, and respondents were required to answer the question of how much they were willing to pay (WTP) and at what price they would stop using the motorway (MAP).…”
Section: Questionnaire Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation