Determining external randomised pilot trial feasibility in preparation for a definitive trial: a web-based survey of corresponding authors of external pilot trial publications

Abstract

Background External randomised pilot trials aim to determine whether a future definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) should be conducted, and if so, how. However, not every pilot trial that suggests that a definitive trial will be feasible will progress to a definitive study. In this study, we surveyed corresponding authors of external randomised pilot trial publications to assess pilot trial outcomes in terms of feasibility and progression. Methods Web-based surveys were sent to corresponding authors of external randomised pilot trial publications, open for four weeks between January and February 2022. Four surveys were produced depending on whether the corresponding author had published a trial protocol or results publication, and whether progression criteria were reported. Surveys asked whether a future RCT was considered feasible, whether progression criteria were met (if applicable), what other factors informed the assessment of pilot trial feasibility, and whether the pilot trial has progressed to further research. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics and conventional content analysis. Results 98 of 276 corresponding authors completed the survey (average response rate of 36% across all surveys). Of these, 89 respondents indicated that their trial had completed. Ninety per cent of respondents who were corresponding authors of completed pilot trials stated that their pilot trial was either feasible (42/89, 47%) or feasible with changes to the trial design (38/89, 43%), yet only 66% (59/89) reported the intention to conduct a future definitive trial. Availability of funding for a future definitive trial and changing priorities of the Chief Investigator were the most common barriers to progression identified. Qualitative research findings was the most frequent factor considered both by corresponding authors who reported and who did not report progression criteria when determining trial feasibility. Conclusions Just under one quarter (21/89, 24%) of respondents who considered their external randomised pilot trial to be feasible, or feasible with changes, did not intend to conduct a definitive trial highlighting research inefficiency and waste. Trial registration Open Science Framework osf.io/d28hr [20 December 2021]

A critical review and user’s guide for conducting feasibility and pilot studies in the physical activity domain.

“…Feasibility/pilot studies should be published as their findings, such as recruitment and retention strategies, can be useful to other research groups doing similar work (Beets et al, 2020; Freedland, 2020). Furthermore, researchers should be transparent in their plans to proceed to an RCT (Mellor, Dutton, et al, 2023), and subsequent RCT publications should cite the feasibility/pilot studies that informed the study protocol and intervention (Beets et al, 2020).…”

Evaluating the effectiveness of key components of Zones of Regulation™ curriculum training on teachers' self‐efficacy at managing self‐regulation needs in autistic pupils

“…Similar to the pilot studies by Mellor et al. (2023) and Lightfoot et al. (2022), the Jisc Online Surveys® platform (Jisc, 2020) was used to collect demographic information on participants, to distribute the outcome measures and to deliver a qualitative survey.…”

“…Data for this study were collected from April to June 2022. Similar to the pilot studies by Mellor et al (2023) and Lightfoot et al (2022), the Jisc Online Surveys® platform (Jisc, 2020) was used to collect demographic information on participants, to distribute the outcome measures and to deliver a qualitative survey. At timepoint 1 (before the training), participants were asked to complete the short form of the TSES (Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2001).…”