2016 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication (ISemantic) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/isemantic.2016.7873836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining elearning critical success factor at sebelas maret university using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, this study shows that institution service quality (global weight = 0.390) is the most important factor influencing the postadoption of e-learning in the Malaysian context. This finding is inconsistent with prior studies that have suggested that institution service quality is the least important factor (Anggrainingsih et al, 2016;Bhuasiri et al, 2012;Fitriastuti et al, 2019;Xaymoungkhoun et al, 2012). Nevertheless, the results of this study are consistent with Anggrainingsih et al (2018) and Lee (2008) studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, this study shows that institution service quality (global weight = 0.390) is the most important factor influencing the postadoption of e-learning in the Malaysian context. This finding is inconsistent with prior studies that have suggested that institution service quality is the least important factor (Anggrainingsih et al, 2016;Bhuasiri et al, 2012;Fitriastuti et al, 2019;Xaymoungkhoun et al, 2012). Nevertheless, the results of this study are consistent with Anggrainingsih et al (2018) and Lee (2008) studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…This finding contradicts prior studies that suggest system quality is the least important (Anggrainingsih et al, 2018;Jie, 2010). Nonetheless, this result is consistent with the majority of prior empirical studies (Anggrainingsih et al, 2016;Fitriastuti et al, 2019;Garg & Jain, 2017;Lukhayu Pritalia et al, 2018;Tseng et al, 2011). University lecturers perceive that the system quality should be tailored to the needs of learners.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1/7, 1/5, 1/3) (3, 5, 7) Strongly Disagree (STS) (1/9, 1/7, 1/5) (5, 7, 9) Agree (S) (3,5,7) (1/7, 1/5, 1/3) Strongly Agree (SS) (5,7,9) (1/9, 1/7, 1/5)…”
Section: Triangular Fuzzy Scale (Reciprocal)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conclude that the most effective CSFs that institutions need to achieve the highest rate of success is 'Technology' with all its similar applications or components. Such components include technology control [10], E-learning system development [10], technologies [10], training for computer literacy & E-learning systems [11], system quality [12], E-learning LMS/system, internet access, E-learning tools, blended learning, LMS/system, E-learning materials and E-learning model [8]. In addition to these are sub-factors, which are related to technology, followed by skills and competencies for using technology for both students and instructors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%