2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining double-K fracture parameters of concrete for compact tension and wedge splitting tests using weight function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…G 0 is the energy release rate needed for an initial crack to grow, marking the onset of nonlinearity. The initial crack length a 0 was shown to have little influence on the initial toughness in terms of stress intensity factor [23,24], thus the same conclusion can be drawn for its counterpart G 0 . In other words, G 0 is also could be reviewed as one material property.…”
Section: Construction Of R-curvesupporting
confidence: 53%
“…G 0 is the energy release rate needed for an initial crack to grow, marking the onset of nonlinearity. The initial crack length a 0 was shown to have little influence on the initial toughness in terms of stress intensity factor [23,24], thus the same conclusion can be drawn for its counterpart G 0 . In other words, G 0 is also could be reviewed as one material property.…”
Section: Construction Of R-curvesupporting
confidence: 53%
“…An improvement over this empirical formula was proposed by Kumar and Barai (2009a). The improved empirical relation is valid for 0.2 ≤ α ≤ 0.9 within 0.7% accuracy as compared with Eq.…”
Section: For Standard Ct Specimenmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…From the results presented by authors [37], it can be seen that the error in results of K IC ini and K IC un for many specimens is more than ±20% which needs further attention for the validity of simplified extreme peak load method. It has been established from the extensive experimental and numerical studies [20][21][22][23][24][25][26]30] that the values of double -K fracture parameters (K IC ini and K IC un ) determined using experimental method and conventional analytical methods (GaussChebyshev integral method, weight function method) are in excellent agreement. Hence, in authors' opinion, the conventional analytical methods (Gauss-Chebyshev integral method, weight function method) can be considered as the standard analytical methods for determining the double -K fracture parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%